[llvm-commits] [PATCH][LNT] Add support for selection of timing statistic (user or real time)

David Blaikie dblaikie at gmail.com
Mon Jul 23 11:13:11 PDT 2012


+David Dean who's generously offered to take a look.

Thanks David - 'preciate the help. I realize you might not have the
context of some of the discussions I had with Daniel months ago about
these timing issues - so certainly feel free to ask any questions
about the direction/design/point of this change that I might've failed
to provide in the original email (visible below) or patch.

On Fri, Jul 20, 2012 at 11:46 AM, David Blaikie <dblaikie at gmail.com> wrote:
> Ping.
>
> +Tobias, in case it interests him too
> +Daniel's other email address, in case that helps
>
> Nearly the 3 month anniversary of this patch.
>
> On Mon, Jul 2, 2012 at 9:34 AM, David Blaikie <dblaikie at gmail.com> wrote:
>> Bump. [5th ping over 2 months]
>>
>> Any feedback would be appreciated - it's by no means a huge change
>> (both in size and scope/value) but will hopefully make it a little
>> easier to investigate other timing properties (& paves the way for
>> collecting more timing data up into LNT at some point, should anyone
>> feel there's value in that).
>>
>> On Tue, Jun 5, 2012 at 10:17 AM, David Blaikie <dblaikie at gmail.com> wrote:
>>> Once more, with feeling: Ping.
>>>
>>> On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 11:49 AM, David Blaikie <dblaikie at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> Ping.
>>>>
>>>> On Mon, May 14, 2012 at 8:54 AM, David Blaikie <dblaikie at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>> Ping.
>>>>>
>>>>> On Sun, Apr 29, 2012 at 9:43 PM, David Blaikie <dblaikie at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>> Bump.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 4:26 PM, David Blaikie <dblaikie at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>> Hi Daniel (& others),
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Here's a couple of patches that add an option to the LNT nt runner to
>>>>>>> allow the selection of statistic to report (user time or real time) &
>>>>>>> includes the necessary plumbing through the test-suite to propagate
>>>>>>> this information (rather than passing a flag down through the
>>>>>>> test-suite strata, this elevates both stats (we could add sys time for
>>>>>>> symmetry at some point - and/or, more broadly, we could also stop
>>>>>>> doing the aggregation (of multisource per-file stats into single
>>>>>>> per-test stats) down in the test-suite & let LNT have more fine
>>>>>>> grained information about the sub-parts of a test case's timing) up
>>>>>>> into the simple report.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> [I removed one instance of the 'summary' parsing in timeit.c - it
>>>>>>> seems there were two instances of it. If there's a reason for the
>>>>>>> apparent duplication I'd love to hear it - then add it back in with a
>>>>>>> comment explaining that. I also removed the 'program' timing there -
>>>>>>> the reports currently can just deliberately pick which statistics they
>>>>>>> want. It seems like only the nightly and simple reports were using
>>>>>>> these values, so I've updated those. I was wondering if I could also
>>>>>>> remove the 'exit' lines so the summaries just look like time(1)
>>>>>>> output, but I haven't got there yet - the exit lines are used from
>>>>>>> these files in some places. Perhaps there are other sources they could
>>>>>>> use instead]
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Anyone have some thoughts on this approach or future work along these lines?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> - David
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: lnt-time-stat.diff
Type: application/octet-stream
Size: 2642 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-commits/attachments/20120723/87bfbfe0/attachment.obj>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: test-suite-time-stat.diff
Type: application/octet-stream
Size: 6895 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-commits/attachments/20120723/87bfbfe0/attachment-0001.obj>


More information about the llvm-commits mailing list