[llvm-commits] [llvm] r157035 - /llvm/trunk/test/ExecutionEngine/MCJIT/lit.local.cfg

Danil Malyshev dmalyshev at accesssoftek.com
Thu May 17 20:58:29 PDT 2012


Hi Eric,

Unfortunately, I could not now completely solve all the problems with the relocations in the darwin 32bit.
However, I did not revert the MCJIT test patches, because they works fine in the platforms that are supported by MCJIT. And these tests skips fine in platforms that are not supported by MCJIT, like for darwin now.
I think switch on these tests for a platform after it will be supported by MCJIT is much better than haven't any MCJIT tests.

Regards,
Danil

________________________________________
From: Eric Christopher [echristo at apple.com]
Sent: Thursday, May 17, 2012 5:51 PM
To: Danil Malyshev
Cc: llvm-commits at cs.uiuc.edu; , Anna Zaks
Subject: Re: [llvm-commits] [llvm] r157035 - /llvm/trunk/test/ExecutionEngine/MCJIT/lit.local.cfg

If you don't finish it today there's nothing wrong with reverting your patch and re-enabling it when everything else is fixed up.

To be clear: if you don't finish it please revert both of your patches and pick it up again tomorrow :)

Thanks!

-eric

On May 17, 2012, at 5:49 PM, Danil Malyshev <dmalyshev at accesssoftek.com> wrote:

> Hi Eric,
>
> I'm working with it right now, and hope to finish it today.
>
>
> Regards,
> Danil
>
> ________________________________________
> From: Eric Christopher [echristo at apple.com]
> Sent: Thursday, May 17, 2012 5:35 PM
> To: Danil Malyshev
> Cc: llvm-commits at cs.uiuc.edu
> Subject: Re: [llvm-commits] [llvm] r157035 - /llvm/trunk/test/ExecutionEngine/MCJIT/lit.local.cfg
>
> On May 17, 2012, at 5:30 PM, Danil Malyshev <dmalyshev at accesssoftek.com> wrote:
>
>> Author: danil
>> Date: Thu May 17 19:30:58 2012
>> New Revision: 157035
>>
>> URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=157035&view=rev
>> Log:
>> Temporarily disabled the MCJIT tests for Darwin, because the RuntimeDyldMachO has a problems with relocations for 32bit x86.
>
> I don't think this is the right way to deal with it. What is your current plan for fixing and re-enabling?
>
> -eric



More information about the llvm-commits mailing list