[llvm-commits] [PATCH] Add RETW and LRETW instructions

[Kay Tiong Khoo]

Can you make these print correctly with Intel syntax? I assume the opcode
remains "ret" but there's some "[word]" decorator suffix?

On Fri, Mar 23, 2012 at 5:22 PM, Bill Wendling <wendling at apple.com> wrote:

> This looks good to me with one change. Please format the LRETW instruction
> like those around it.
>
> -bw
>
> On Mar 23, 2012, at 3:49 PM, Charles Davis wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > This very simple patch adds the RETW and LRETW instructions to the X86
> backend. I have noticed no test regressions with this patch. OK to commit?
> >
> > Chip
> > <retw.patch>_______________________________________________
> > llvm-commits mailing list
> > llvm-commits at cs.uiuc.edu
> > http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvm-commits
>
> _______________________________________________
> llvm-commits mailing list
> llvm-commits at cs.uiuc.edu
> http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvm-commits
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-commits/attachments/20120324/42f13a98/attachment.html>