[llvm-commits] [PATCH] Fix PR11004: Crash in llc arm backend

[James Molloy]

Ah, I see.

Well that's fine then.

From: Cameron Zwarich [mailto:zwarich at apple.com]
Sent: 26 September 2011 08:17
To: James Molloy
Cc: David Meyer; Commit Messages and Patches for LLVM
Subject: Re: [llvm-commits] [PATCH] Fix PR11004: Crash in llc arm backend

The obvious ones work, but something like 113 x i396 does not.

Cameron

On Sep 26, 2011, at 12:04 AM, James Molloy wrote:


Hi Cameron,

My testing found most obvious vector types to be supported in codegen (<{1,2,3,4,8,16,32,64} x {float,i8,16,i32,i64}>) - were there any types in particular that aren't supported?

Cheers,

James

From: llvm-commits-bounces at cs.uiuc.edu<mailto:llvm-commits-bounces at cs.uiuc.edu> [mailto:llvm-commits-bounces at cs.uiuc.edu] On Behalf Of Cameron Zwarich
Sent: 26 September 2011 06:11
To: David Meyer
Cc: Commit Messages and Patches for LLVM
Subject: Re: [llvm-commits] [PATCH] Fix PR11004: Crash in llc arm backend

On Sep 25, 2011, at 5:45 PM, David Meyer wrote:



Cameron,

With regards to your comment that it is inconsiderate to break the tree intentionally, you are forgetting that this was an experimental feature that never worked outside of small test cases. Neither Clang nor llvm-gcc will generate byval on ARM, so it gets no real testing. It might be more considerate to users to just add an assert saying that ARM byval doesn't work.

I dislike the idea of selective IR support. This creates a hidden (undocumented) contract between the frontends and backends, which limits the IR that is valid. It also treats external producers of bitcode as second-class citizens, since they must effectively mimic Clang or DragonEgg to guarantee that their output will be supported. It is nicer if every backend can handle any valid bitcode (even if doing so is not terribly efficient).

I dislike it too, but be warned that there are other things that just plain aren't supported by the ARM backend, e.g. arbitrary vector types.



If there are no more objections, I'll commit, and un-XFAIL the tests which now pass.
(2011-06-09-TailCallByVal.ll and 2010-11-04-BigByval.ll)

No objections from me.

Cameron


-- IMPORTANT NOTICE: The contents of this email and any attachments are confidential and may also be privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately and do not disclose the contents  to any other person, use it for any purpose, or store or copy the information in any medium. Thank you.


-- IMPORTANT NOTICE: The contents of this email and any attachments are confidential and may also be privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately and do not disclose the contents to any other person, use it for any purpose, or store or copy the information in any medium. Thank you.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-commits/attachments/20110926/12b170aa/attachment.html>