[llvm-commits] [llvm] r132224 - in /llvm/trunk: lib/CodeGen/AsmPrinter/AsmPrinter.cpp test/DebugInfo/X86/subreg.ll

Rafael Espindola rafael.espindola at gmail.com
Fri May 27 15:15:01 PDT 2011


Author: rafael
Date: Fri May 27 17:15:01 2011
New Revision: 132224

URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=132224&view=rev
Log:
Fix a regression I recently introduced by removing DwarfRegNum of
subregisters:

When a value is in a subregister, at least report the location as being
the superregister. We should extend the .td files to encode the bit
range so that we can produce a DW_OP_bit_piece.

Added:
    llvm/trunk/test/DebugInfo/X86/subreg.ll
Modified:
    llvm/trunk/lib/CodeGen/AsmPrinter/AsmPrinter.cpp

Modified: llvm/trunk/lib/CodeGen/AsmPrinter/AsmPrinter.cpp
URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/llvm/trunk/lib/CodeGen/AsmPrinter/AsmPrinter.cpp?rev=132224&r1=132223&r2=132224&view=diff
==============================================================================
--- llvm/trunk/lib/CodeGen/AsmPrinter/AsmPrinter.cpp (original)
+++ llvm/trunk/lib/CodeGen/AsmPrinter/AsmPrinter.cpp Fri May 27 17:15:01 2011
@@ -763,7 +763,22 @@
 /// EmitDwarfRegOp - Emit dwarf register operation.
 void AsmPrinter::EmitDwarfRegOp(const MachineLocation &MLoc) const {
   const TargetRegisterInfo *TRI = TM.getRegisterInfo();
-  unsigned Reg = TRI->getDwarfRegNum(MLoc.getReg(), false);
+  int Reg = TRI->getDwarfRegNum(MLoc.getReg(), false);
+
+  for (const unsigned *SR = TRI->getSuperRegisters(MLoc.getReg());
+       *SR && Reg == -1; ++SR) {
+    Reg = TRI->getDwarfRegNum(*SR, false);
+    // FIXME: Get the bit range this register uses of the superregister
+    // so that we can produce a DW_OP_bit_piece
+  }
+
+  // FIXME: Handle cases like a super register being encoded as
+  // DW_OP_reg 32 DW_OP_piece 4 DW_OP_reg 33
+
+  // FIXME: We have no reasonable way of handling errors in here. The
+  // caller might be in the middle of an dwarf expression. We should
+  // probably assert that Reg >= 0 once debug info generation is more mature.
+
   if (int Offset =  MLoc.getOffset()) {
     if (Reg < 32) {
       OutStreamer.AddComment(
@@ -788,6 +803,8 @@
       EmitULEB128(Reg);
     }
   }
+
+  // FIXME: Produce a DW_OP_bit_piece if we used a superregister
 }
 
 bool AsmPrinter::doFinalization(Module &M) {

Added: llvm/trunk/test/DebugInfo/X86/subreg.ll
URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/llvm/trunk/test/DebugInfo/X86/subreg.ll?rev=132224&view=auto
==============================================================================
--- llvm/trunk/test/DebugInfo/X86/subreg.ll (added)
+++ llvm/trunk/test/DebugInfo/X86/subreg.ll Fri May 27 17:15:01 2011
@@ -0,0 +1,27 @@
+; RUN: llc %s -mtriple=x86_64-pc-linux-gnu -O0 -o - | FileCheck %s
+
+; We are testing that a value in a 16 bit register gets reported as
+; being in its superregister.
+; FIXME: There should be a DW_OP_bit_piece too.
+
+; CHECK: .byte   80                      # DW_OP_reg0
+
+define i16 @f(i16 signext %zzz) nounwind {
+entry:
+  call void @llvm.dbg.value(metadata !{i16 %zzz}, i64 0, metadata !0)
+  %conv = sext i16 %zzz to i32, !dbg !7
+  %conv1 = trunc i32 %conv to i16
+  ret i16 %conv1
+}
+
+declare void @llvm.dbg.value(metadata, i64, metadata) nounwind readnone
+
+!0 = metadata !{i32 590081, metadata !1, metadata !"zzz", metadata !2, i32 16777219, metadata !6, i32 0} ; [ DW_TAG_arg_variable ]
+!1 = metadata !{i32 589870, i32 0, metadata !2, metadata !"f", metadata !"f", metadata !"", metadata !2, i32 3, metadata !4, i1 false, i1 true, i32 0, i32 0, i32 0, i32 256, i1 false, i16 (i16)* @f, null, null} ; [ DW_TAG_subprogram ]
+!2 = metadata !{i32 589865, metadata !"/home/espindola/llvm/test.c", metadata !"/home/espindola/tmpfs/build", metadata !3} ; [ DW_TAG_file_type ]
+!3 = metadata !{i32 589841, i32 0, i32 12, metadata !"/home/espindola/llvm/test.c", metadata !"/home/espindola/tmpfs/build", metadata !"clang version 3.0 ()", i1 true, i1 false, metadata !"", i32 0} ; [ DW_TAG_compile_unit ]
+!4 = metadata !{i32 589845, metadata !2, metadata !"", metadata !2, i32 0, i64 0, i64 0, i32 0, i32 0, i32 0, metadata !5, i32 0, i32 0} ; [ DW_TAG_subroutine_type ]
+!5 = metadata !{null}
+!6 = metadata !{i32 589860, metadata !3, metadata !"short", null, i32 0, i64 16, i64 16, i64 0, i32 0, i32 5} ; [ DW_TAG_base_type ]
+!7 = metadata !{i32 4, i32 22, metadata !8, null}
+!8 = metadata !{i32 589835, metadata !1, i32 3, i32 19, metadata !2, i32 0} ; [ DW_TAG_lexical_block ]





More information about the llvm-commits mailing list