[llvm-commits] [patch] Change how we handle mandatory unwind tables

[Rafael Espíndola]

I am walking to work but it is at

http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/llvm-commits/Week-of-Mon-20110523/121283.html

The table I posted in reply to Renato's email should help too.

Cheers,
Rafael
 On May 24, 2011 10:11 AM, "Duncan Sands" <baldrick at free.fr> wrote:
> Hi Rafael,
>
>>>> The change to prune-eh also removes some optimization opportunities.
>>>> Preventing adding nounwind can prevent converting an invoke to a call.
>>>
>>> I'm confused. What has prune-eh got to do with unwind-tables?
>>
>> It adds the nounwind attribute.
>
> now I'm even more confused, but perhaps that's because I lost your patch.
> Can you please send me a copy.
>
> Thanks, Duncan.
> _______________________________________________
> llvm-commits mailing list
> llvm-commits at cs.uiuc.edu
> http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvm-commits
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-commits/attachments/20110524/e549e75e/attachment.html>