[llvm-commits] Support for explicit argument form of X86 string instructions

[Joerg Sonnenberger]

On Tue, Mar 15, 2011 at 01:03:10PM -0700, Chris Lattner wrote:
> >> Instead of handling "lods" and "stos" in ParseInstruction, can't you
> >> just ignore these two cases and let the suffix search code in
> >> MatchAndEmitInstruction handle them?
> > 
> > MatchAndEmitInstruction and doesn't the register anymore, so it can't do
> > that matching, I think. The actual instructions can't be used without
> > suffix.
> 
> I'm not sure what you mean,

lods without arguments is ambigious and MatchAndEmitInstruction doesn't
see the optional arguments.

Joerg