[llvm-commits] [patch] Don't link as many parts of llvm into bugpoint

[Rafael Espindola]

On 9 August 2010 22:56, Sandeep Patel <deeppatel1987 at gmail.com> wrote:
> If this and the previous patches related to plugins break bugpoint on
> MinGW, please revert them. I'd like for my users to be able to reduce
> bugs for me.

They don't. The plugin patch brakes bugpoint's own tests since the
broken passes it uses are now in a plugin. That was considered a
better solution than adding those passes to opt.

I did post a patch that would add them to opt instead. If you prefer
that you can try to convince others that it was better.

> deep

Cheers,
-- 
Rafael Ávila de Espíndola