[llvm-commits] [llvm] r94944 - /llvm/trunk/test/Transforms/InstCombine/2007-03-27-PR1280.ll

[Eli Friedman]

Author: efriedma
Date: Sat Jan 30 22:40:45 2010
New Revision: 94944

URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=94944&view=rev
Log:
Remove test which is no longer relevant.


Removed:
    llvm/trunk/test/Transforms/InstCombine/2007-03-27-PR1280.ll

Removed: llvm/trunk/test/Transforms/InstCombine/2007-03-27-PR1280.ll
URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/llvm/trunk/test/Transforms/InstCombine/2007-03-27-PR1280.ll?rev=94943&view=auto

==============================================================================
--- llvm/trunk/test/Transforms/InstCombine/2007-03-27-PR1280.ll (original)
+++ llvm/trunk/test/Transforms/InstCombine/2007-03-27-PR1280.ll (removed)
@@ -1,15 +0,0 @@
-; PR1280 - we should be able to reduce this function to a trunc/sext but it
-;          would involve using a bit width (24) that doesn't match a size that
-;          the back end can handle. This test makes sure that such a transform
-;          is not done. It should be removed when code gen supports "funny"
-;          bit widths.
-
-; RUN: opt < %s -instcombine -S | grep {add i49.*-8388608}
-
-define i49 @test5(i49 %x) {
-        ;; If we have ADD(XOR(AND(X, 0xFF), 0x80), 0xF..F80), it's a sext.
-        %X = and i49 %x, 16777215                     ; 0x0000000ffffff
-        %tmp.2 = xor i49 %X, 8388608                  ; 0x0000000800000
-        %tmp.4 = add i49 %tmp.2, -8388608             ; 0x1FFFFFF800000
-        ret i49 %tmp.4
-}