[llvm-commits] [patch] Used TimedExec.sh everywhere

[Rafael Espindola]

> Why SIGCONT? Wouldn't SIGTERM be more conventional? Or, would
> SIGKILL be best, since you may not necessarily trust the
> application's signal handlers to quit promptly?

This is not to kill the application, it is to check that it is running.
The idea is that kill will return an error if it cannot send the signal,
that is why I changed it to a signal that will have no effect on a
running application.

> Dan
>
>

Cheers,
-- 
Rafael Ávila de Espíndola