[llvm-commits] [llvm] r82701 - /llvm/trunk/docs/LangRef.html

[Chris Lattner]

On Sep 25, 2009, at 9:48 AM, Dale Johannesen wrote:

>>>
>>> Functions starting with __ are fair game, I don't think we need
>>> document those at this level.  Could you add the others to my list?
>>
>> Is there any reason to have an explicit list?  Why not just say  
>> "llvm assumes that functions defined in libc and libm are well  
>> known, this is something we'd like to fix in the future to better  
>> support freestanding environments." and leave it at that?
>
> What's in libc and libm varies from target to target, but I'm OK  
> with pointing to one of the standards (probably C99) if you want to  
> do that.

I'm arguing that the statement be fuzzy, so we don't have to keep it  
up to date.  Pointing to c99 is fine if you to do that.

-Chris