[llvm-commits] [PATCH] x86_64 detection and building on 10.6

[Shantonu Sen]

Case in point. Had this change been already committed, it would have  
been overwritten by: <http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/llvm-commits/Week-of-Mon-20090907/086520.html 
 >

I don't think LLVM should be going out on a limb until there's a  
reasonable safeguard that local changes won't regress. So far the  
evidence is that this type of change would regress within days

Shantonu

Sent from my MacBook

On Sep 2, 2009, at 1:04 PM, Mike Stump wrote:

> On Sep 2, 2009, at 9:41 AM, Shantonu Sen wrote:
>> Isn't config.guess upstream from FSF? Do we really want to fork  
>> this file?
>
> No.  The upstream is presently getting this support as well through  
> other channels.  This isn't a fork, but a preview of what is to  
> come.  When their tree gets it, and it is refreshened through the  
> usual updates, eventually we'll get it for free.  We should not be  
> shy about `fixing' it now.