[llvm-commits] [llvm] r72650 - in /llvm/trunk:include/llvm/CodeGen/JITCodeEmitter.hinclude/llvm/CodeGen/MachineCodeEmitter.hinclude/llvm/ExecutionEngine/JITMemoryManager.hlib/CodeGen/MachOWriter.cpp lib/CodeGen/MachOWriter.hlib/ExecutionEngi

[Aaron Gray]

It could be the main earlier patch r72631 rather than 72650. But AFAICS I 
really doubt it.

Aaron

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Bruno Cardoso Lopes" <bruno.cardoso at gmail.com>
To: "Julien Lerouge" <jlerouge at apple.com>; "Commit Messages and Patches for 
LLVM" <llvm-commits at cs.uiuc.edu>
Sent: Wednesday, June 03, 2009 5:58 PM
Subject: Re: [llvm-commits] [llvm] r72650 - in 
/llvm/trunk:include/llvm/CodeGen/JITCodeEmitter.hinclude/llvm/CodeGen/MachineCodeEmitter.hinclude/llvm/ExecutionEngine/JITMemoryManager.hlib/CodeGen/MachOWriter.cpp 
lib/CodeGen/MachOWriter.hlib/ExecutionEngi


> Hi Julien,
>
>> Hello Bruno,
>>
>> I have a buildbot running some nightly tests here on MingW that started
>> to complain somewhere between r72618 and r72690.
>>
>> Some of the tests we are running with lli are triggering the following
>> assertion:
>> Assertion failed: Addr && "Code generation didn't add function to
>> GlobalAddress table!", file
>> c:/cygwin/home/jlerouge/buildbot/llvm-src/lib/ExecutionEngine/JIT/JIT.cpp,
>> line 603
>>
>> I realize this is very vague, but maybe you have any idea where that
>> could be coming from ? Those tests have been pretty stable for the last
>> couple month. I'll take a closer look in the coming days, but in the
>> meantime, I thought I'd give a heads up ;-)
>
> Could you provide me a test case so I can go further? I reverted 72650 for 
> now.
> Thanks,
>
> -- 
> Bruno Cardoso Lopes
> http://www.brunocardoso.cc
> _______________________________________________
> llvm-commits mailing list
> llvm-commits at cs.uiuc.edu
> http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvm-commits