[llvm-commits] [llvm] r52537 - /llvm/trunk/lib/Transforms/IPO/DeadArgumentElimination.cpp

Matthijs Kooijman matthijs at stdin.nl
Wed Jul 2 10:45:15 PDT 2008


> Maybe I'm missing something, but wouldn't this assume call i32 and
> call {i32} use the same calling convention?  I don't think we can assume
> that in general.
The pass is only processing internal functions and updating all callers, so
calling conventions should not apply.

Gr.

Matthijs
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-commits/attachments/20080702/81a63ff2/attachment.sig>


More information about the llvm-commits mailing list