[llvm-commits] [llvm] r52537 - /llvm/trunk/lib/Transforms/IPO/DeadArgumentElimination.cpp

[Duncan Sands]

> Maybe I'm missing something, but wouldn't this assume call i32 and
> call {i32} use the same calling convention?  I don't think we can assume
> that in general.

I've noticed that llvm-gcc returns a complex number (i.e. { float, float })
as { double } and not double on some platforms.  If this is for ABI reasons
(and not a bug!) then it would be an example of what Dale is talking about.

Ciao,

Duncan.