[llvm-commits] [llvm] r48527 - /llvm/trunk/test/Transforms/LICM/
Tanya Lattner
tonic at nondot.org
Tue Mar 18 20:47:14 PDT 2008
Author: tbrethou
Date: Tue Mar 18 22:47:13 2008
New Revision: 48527
URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=48527&view=rev
Log:
Remove llvm-upgrade and update tests.
Modified:
llvm/trunk/test/Transforms/LICM/2003-02-26-LoopExitNotDominated.ll
llvm/trunk/test/Transforms/LICM/2003-02-27-NestedLoopExitBlocks.ll
llvm/trunk/test/Transforms/LICM/2003-02-27-PreheaderExitNodeUpdate.ll
llvm/trunk/test/Transforms/LICM/2003-02-27-PreheaderProblem.ll
llvm/trunk/test/Transforms/LICM/2003-02-27-StoreSinkPHIs.ll
llvm/trunk/test/Transforms/LICM/2003-02-28-PromoteDifferentType.ll
llvm/trunk/test/Transforms/LICM/2003-05-02-LoadHoist.ll
llvm/trunk/test/Transforms/LICM/2003-08-04-TrappingInstHoist.ll
llvm/trunk/test/Transforms/LICM/2003-08-04-TrappingInstOkHoist.ll
llvm/trunk/test/Transforms/LICM/2003-12-11-SinkingToPHI.ll
llvm/trunk/test/Transforms/LICM/2003-12-13-VolatilePromote.ll
llvm/trunk/test/Transforms/LICM/2004-09-14-AliasAnalysisInvalidate.llx
llvm/trunk/test/Transforms/LICM/2004-11-17-UndefIndexCrash.ll
llvm/trunk/test/Transforms/LICM/2005-03-24-LICM-Aggregate-Crash.ll
llvm/trunk/test/Transforms/LICM/2006-09-12-DeadUserOfSunkInstr.ll
llvm/trunk/test/Transforms/LICM/basictest.ll
llvm/trunk/test/Transforms/LICM/no-preheader-test.ll
llvm/trunk/test/Transforms/LICM/sink_critical_edge.ll
llvm/trunk/test/Transforms/LICM/sink_inst.ll
llvm/trunk/test/Transforms/LICM/sink_load.ll
llvm/trunk/test/Transforms/LICM/sink_multiple.ll
llvm/trunk/test/Transforms/LICM/sink_multiple_exits.ll
llvm/trunk/test/Transforms/LICM/sink_only_some_exits.ll
llvm/trunk/test/Transforms/LICM/sink_phi_node_use.ll
llvm/trunk/test/Transforms/LICM/sink_trapping_inst.ll
Modified: llvm/trunk/test/Transforms/LICM/2003-02-26-LoopExitNotDominated.ll
URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/llvm/trunk/test/Transforms/LICM/2003-02-26-LoopExitNotDominated.ll?rev=48527&r1=48526&r2=48527&view=diff
==============================================================================
--- llvm/trunk/test/Transforms/LICM/2003-02-26-LoopExitNotDominated.ll (original)
+++ llvm/trunk/test/Transforms/LICM/2003-02-26-LoopExitNotDominated.ll Tue Mar 18 22:47:13 2008
@@ -1,22 +1,18 @@
-; RUN: llvm-upgrade < %s | llvm-as | opt -basicaa -licm -disable-output
+; RUN: llvm-as < %s | opt -basicaa -licm -disable-output
;%MoveArray = external global [64 x ulong]
-implementation ; Functions:
-
-void %InitMoveArray() {
-bb3: ; No predecessors!
- %X = alloca [2 x ulong]
- br bool false, label %bb13, label %bb4
-
+define void @InitMoveArray() {
+bb3:
+ %X = alloca [2 x i64] ; <[2 x i64]*> [#uses=1]
+ br i1 false, label %bb13, label %bb4
bb4: ; preds = %bb3
- %reg3011 = getelementptr [2 x ulong]* %X, long 0, long 0
+ %reg3011 = getelementptr [2 x i64]* %X, i64 0, i64 0 ; <i64*> [#uses=1]
br label %bb8
-
bb8: ; preds = %bb8, %bb4
- store ulong 0, ulong* %reg3011
- br bool false, label %bb8, label %bb13
-
+ store i64 0, i64* %reg3011
+ br i1 false, label %bb8, label %bb13
bb13: ; preds = %bb8, %bb3
ret void
}
+
Modified: llvm/trunk/test/Transforms/LICM/2003-02-27-NestedLoopExitBlocks.ll
URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/llvm/trunk/test/Transforms/LICM/2003-02-27-NestedLoopExitBlocks.ll?rev=48527&r1=48526&r2=48527&view=diff
==============================================================================
--- llvm/trunk/test/Transforms/LICM/2003-02-27-NestedLoopExitBlocks.ll (original)
+++ llvm/trunk/test/Transforms/LICM/2003-02-27-NestedLoopExitBlocks.ll Tue Mar 18 22:47:13 2008
@@ -1,22 +1,17 @@
; Exit blocks need to be updated for all nested loops...
-; RUN: llvm-upgrade < %s | llvm-as | opt -loopsimplify
-
-implementation ; Functions:
-
-int %yyparse() {
-bb0: ; No predecessors!
- br bool false, label %UnifiedExitNode, label %bb19
+; RUN: llvm-as < %s | opt -loopsimplify
+define i32 @yyparse() {
+bb0:
+ br i1 false, label %UnifiedExitNode, label %bb19
bb19: ; preds = %bb28, %bb0
- br bool false, label %bb28, label %UnifiedExitNode
-
+ br i1 false, label %bb28, label %UnifiedExitNode
bb28: ; preds = %bb32, %bb19
- br bool false, label %bb32, label %bb19
-
+ br i1 false, label %bb32, label %bb19
bb32: ; preds = %bb28
- br bool false, label %UnifiedExitNode, label %bb28
-
+ br i1 false, label %UnifiedExitNode, label %bb28
UnifiedExitNode: ; preds = %bb32, %bb19, %bb0
- ret int 0
+ ret i32 0
}
+
Modified: llvm/trunk/test/Transforms/LICM/2003-02-27-PreheaderExitNodeUpdate.ll
URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/llvm/trunk/test/Transforms/LICM/2003-02-27-PreheaderExitNodeUpdate.ll?rev=48527&r1=48526&r2=48527&view=diff
==============================================================================
--- llvm/trunk/test/Transforms/LICM/2003-02-27-PreheaderExitNodeUpdate.ll (original)
+++ llvm/trunk/test/Transforms/LICM/2003-02-27-PreheaderExitNodeUpdate.ll Tue Mar 18 22:47:13 2008
@@ -1,19 +1,16 @@
; This testcase fails because preheader insertion is not updating exit node
; information for loops.
-; RUN: llvm-upgrade < %s | llvm-as | opt -licm
+; RUN: llvm-as < %s | opt -licm
-int %main(int %argc, sbyte** %argv) {
-bb0: ; No predecessors!
- br bool false, label %bb7, label %bb5
-
-bb5: ; preds = %bb5, %bb0
- br bool false, label %bb5, label %bb7
-
-bb7: ; preds = %bb7, %bb5, %bb0
- br bool false, label %bb7, label %bb10
-
-bb10: ; preds = %bb7
- ret int 0
+define i32 @main(i32 %argc, i8** %argv) {
+bb0:
+ br i1 false, label %bb7, label %bb5
+bb5: ; preds = %bb5, %bb0
+ br i1 false, label %bb5, label %bb7
+bb7: ; preds = %bb7, %bb5, %bb0
+ br i1 false, label %bb7, label %bb10
+bb10: ; preds = %bb7
+ ret i32 0
}
Modified: llvm/trunk/test/Transforms/LICM/2003-02-27-PreheaderProblem.ll
URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/llvm/trunk/test/Transforms/LICM/2003-02-27-PreheaderProblem.ll?rev=48527&r1=48526&r2=48527&view=diff
==============================================================================
--- llvm/trunk/test/Transforms/LICM/2003-02-27-PreheaderProblem.ll (original)
+++ llvm/trunk/test/Transforms/LICM/2003-02-27-PreheaderProblem.ll Tue Mar 18 22:47:13 2008
@@ -3,24 +3,22 @@
; happens because preheader insertion doesn't insert a preheader for this
; case... bad.
-; RUN: llvm-upgrade < %s | llvm-as | opt -licm -adce -simplifycfg | llvm-dis | \
+; RUN: llvm-as < %s | opt -licm -adce -simplifycfg | llvm-dis | \
; RUN: not grep {br }
-int %main(int %argc) {
- br label %bb5
-
-bb5: ; preds = %bb5, %0
- %I = phi int [0, %0], [%I2, %bb5]
- %I2 = add int %I, 1
- %c = seteq int %I2, 10
- br bool %c, label %bb5, label %bb8
-
-bb8: ; preds = %bb8, %bb5
- %cann-indvar = phi uint [ 0, %bb8 ], [ 0, %bb5 ]
- %X = add int %argc, %argc ; Loop invariant
- br bool false, label %bb8, label %bb10
-
-bb10: ; preds = %bb8
- ret int %X
+define i32 @main(i32 %argc) {
+; <label>:0
+ br label %bb5
+bb5: ; preds = %bb5, %0
+ %I = phi i32 [ 0, %0 ], [ %I2, %bb5 ] ; <i32> [#uses=1]
+ %I2 = add i32 %I, 1 ; <i32> [#uses=2]
+ %c = icmp eq i32 %I2, 10 ; <i1> [#uses=1]
+ br i1 %c, label %bb5, label %bb8
+bb8: ; preds = %bb8, %bb5
+ %cann-indvar = phi i32 [ 0, %bb8 ], [ 0, %bb5 ] ; <i32> [#uses=0]
+ %X = add i32 %argc, %argc ; <i32> [#uses=1]
+ br i1 false, label %bb8, label %bb10
+bb10: ; preds = %bb8
+ ret i32 %X
}
Modified: llvm/trunk/test/Transforms/LICM/2003-02-27-StoreSinkPHIs.ll
URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/llvm/trunk/test/Transforms/LICM/2003-02-27-StoreSinkPHIs.ll?rev=48527&r1=48526&r2=48527&view=diff
==============================================================================
--- llvm/trunk/test/Transforms/LICM/2003-02-27-StoreSinkPHIs.ll (original)
+++ llvm/trunk/test/Transforms/LICM/2003-02-27-StoreSinkPHIs.ll Tue Mar 18 22:47:13 2008
@@ -1,13 +1,15 @@
; LICM is adding stores before phi nodes. bad.
-; RUN: llvm-upgrade < %s | llvm-as | opt -licm
+; RUN: llvm-as < %s | opt -licm
-bool %test(bool %c) {
- br bool %c, label %Loop, label %Out
-Loop:
- store int 0, int* null
- br bool %c, label %Loop, label %Out
-Out:
- %X = phi bool [%c, %0], [true, %Loop]
- ret bool %X
+define i1 @test(i1 %c) {
+; <label>:0
+ br i1 %c, label %Loop, label %Out
+Loop: ; preds = %Loop, %0
+ store i32 0, i32* null
+ br i1 %c, label %Loop, label %Out
+Out: ; preds = %Loop, %0
+ %X = phi i1 [ %c, %0 ], [ true, %Loop ] ; <i1> [#uses=1]
+ ret i1 %X
}
+
Modified: llvm/trunk/test/Transforms/LICM/2003-02-28-PromoteDifferentType.ll
URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/llvm/trunk/test/Transforms/LICM/2003-02-28-PromoteDifferentType.ll?rev=48527&r1=48526&r2=48527&view=diff
==============================================================================
--- llvm/trunk/test/Transforms/LICM/2003-02-28-PromoteDifferentType.ll (original)
+++ llvm/trunk/test/Transforms/LICM/2003-02-28-PromoteDifferentType.ll Tue Mar 18 22:47:13 2008
@@ -1,15 +1,15 @@
; Test that hoisting is disabled for pointers of different types...
;
-; RUN: llvm-upgrade < %s | llvm-as | opt -licm
+; RUN: llvm-as < %s | opt -licm
-void %test(int* %P) {
+define void @test(i32* %P) {
br label %Loop
-Loop:
- store int 5, int* %P
- %P2 = cast int* %P to sbyte*
- store sbyte 4, sbyte* %P2
- br bool true, label %Loop, label %Out
-Out:
+Loop: ; preds = %Loop, %0
+ store i32 5, i32* %P
+ %P2 = bitcast i32* %P to i8* ; <i8*> [#uses=1]
+ store i8 4, i8* %P2
+ br i1 true, label %Loop, label %Out
+Out: ; preds = %Loop
ret void
}
Modified: llvm/trunk/test/Transforms/LICM/2003-05-02-LoadHoist.ll
URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/llvm/trunk/test/Transforms/LICM/2003-05-02-LoadHoist.ll?rev=48527&r1=48526&r2=48527&view=diff
==============================================================================
--- llvm/trunk/test/Transforms/LICM/2003-05-02-LoadHoist.ll (original)
+++ llvm/trunk/test/Transforms/LICM/2003-05-02-LoadHoist.ll Tue Mar 18 22:47:13 2008
@@ -3,19 +3,21 @@
; loaded from. Basically if the load gets hoisted, the subtract gets turned
; into a constant zero.
;
-; RUN: llvm-upgrade < %s | llvm-as | opt -licm -load-vn -gcse -instcombine | llvm-dis | grep load
+; RUN: llvm-as < %s | opt -licm -load-vn -gcse -instcombine | llvm-dis | grep load
-%X = global int 7
-declare void %foo()
+ at X = global i32 7 ; <i32*> [#uses=2]
-int %test(bool %c) {
- %A = load int *%X
+declare void @foo()
+
+define i32 @test(i1 %c) {
+ %A = load i32* @X ; <i32> [#uses=1]
br label %Loop
-Loop:
- call void %foo()
- %B = load int *%X ;; Should not hoist this load!
- br bool %c, label %Loop, label %Out
-Out:
- %C = sub int %A, %B
- ret int %C
+Loop: ; preds = %Loop, %0
+ call void @foo( )
+ ;; Should not hoist this load!
+ %B = load i32* @X ; <i32> [#uses=1]
+ br i1 %c, label %Loop, label %Out
+Out: ; preds = %Loop
+ %C = sub i32 %A, %B ; <i32> [#uses=1]
+ ret i32 %C
}
Modified: llvm/trunk/test/Transforms/LICM/2003-08-04-TrappingInstHoist.ll
URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/llvm/trunk/test/Transforms/LICM/2003-08-04-TrappingInstHoist.ll?rev=48527&r1=48526&r2=48527&view=diff
==============================================================================
--- llvm/trunk/test/Transforms/LICM/2003-08-04-TrappingInstHoist.ll (original)
+++ llvm/trunk/test/Transforms/LICM/2003-08-04-TrappingInstHoist.ll Tue Mar 18 22:47:13 2008
@@ -1,27 +1,26 @@
; This testcase tests for a problem where LICM hoists
; potentially trapping instructions when they are not guaranteed to execute.
;
-; RUN: llvm-upgrade < %s | llvm-as | opt -licm | llvm-dis | %prcontext "IfUnEqual" 2 | grep div
+; RUN: llvm-as < %s | opt -licm | llvm-dis | %prcontext "IfUnEqual" 2 | grep div
-%X = global int 0
-declare void %foo()
+ at X = global i32 0 ; <i32*> [#uses=1]
-int %test(bool %c) {
- %A = load int *%X
- br label %Loop
-Loop:
- call void %foo()
- br bool %c, label %LoopTail, label %IfUnEqual
+declare void @foo()
-IfUnEqual:
- %B1 = div int 4, %A ;; Should not hoist this div!
+define i32 @test(i1 %c) {
+ %A = load i32* @X ; <i32> [#uses=2]
+ br label %Loop
+Loop: ; preds = %LoopTail, %0
+ call void @foo( )
+ br i1 %c, label %LoopTail, label %IfUnEqual
+IfUnEqual: ; preds = %Loop
+ %B1 = sdiv i32 4, %A ; <i32> [#uses=1]
br label %LoopTail
-
-LoopTail:
- %B = phi int [ 0, %Loop ], [ %B1, %IfUnEqual]
- br bool %c, label %Loop, label %Out
-
-Out:
- %C = sub int %A, %B
- ret int %C
+LoopTail: ; preds = %IfUnEqual, %Loop
+ %B = phi i32 [ 0, %Loop ], [ %B1, %IfUnEqual ] ; <i32> [#uses=1]
+ br i1 %c, label %Loop, label %Out
+Out: ; preds = %LoopTail
+ %C = sub i32 %A, %B ; <i32> [#uses=1]
+ ret i32 %C
}
+
Modified: llvm/trunk/test/Transforms/LICM/2003-08-04-TrappingInstOkHoist.ll
URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/llvm/trunk/test/Transforms/LICM/2003-08-04-TrappingInstOkHoist.ll?rev=48527&r1=48526&r2=48527&view=diff
==============================================================================
--- llvm/trunk/test/Transforms/LICM/2003-08-04-TrappingInstOkHoist.ll (original)
+++ llvm/trunk/test/Transforms/LICM/2003-08-04-TrappingInstOkHoist.ll Tue Mar 18 22:47:13 2008
@@ -1,20 +1,21 @@
; This testcase tests to make sure a trapping instruction is hoisted when
; it is guaranteed to execute.
;
-; RUN: llvm-upgrade < %s | llvm-as | opt -licm | llvm-dis | %prcontext "test" 2 | grep div
+; RUN: llvm-as < %s | opt -licm | llvm-dis | %prcontext "test" 2 | grep div
-%X = global int 0
-declare void %foo(int)
+ at X = global i32 0 ; <i32*> [#uses=1]
-int %test(bool %c) {
- %A = load int *%X
- br label %Loop
-Loop:
- %B = div int 4, %A ;; Should have hoisted this div!
- call void %foo(int %B)
- br bool %c, label %Loop, label %Out
+declare void @foo(i32)
-Out:
- %C = sub int %A, %B
- ret int %C
+define i32 @test(i1 %c) {
+ %A = load i32* @X ; <i32> [#uses=2]
+ br label %Loop
+Loop: ; preds = %Loop, %0
+ ;; Should have hoisted this div!
+ %B = sdiv i32 4, %A ; <i32> [#uses=2]
+ call void @foo( i32 %B )
+ br i1 %c, label %Loop, label %Out
+Out: ; preds = %Loop
+ %C = sub i32 %A, %B ; <i32> [#uses=1]
+ ret i32 %C
}
Modified: llvm/trunk/test/Transforms/LICM/2003-12-11-SinkingToPHI.ll
URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/llvm/trunk/test/Transforms/LICM/2003-12-11-SinkingToPHI.ll?rev=48527&r1=48526&r2=48527&view=diff
==============================================================================
--- llvm/trunk/test/Transforms/LICM/2003-12-11-SinkingToPHI.ll (original)
+++ llvm/trunk/test/Transforms/LICM/2003-12-11-SinkingToPHI.ll Tue Mar 18 22:47:13 2008
@@ -1,20 +1,16 @@
-; RUN: llvm-upgrade < %s | llvm-as | opt -licm | lli
+; RUN: llvm-as < %s | opt -licm | lli
-implementation ; Functions:
-
-int %main() {
+define i32 @main() {
entry:
br label %Loop
-
-Loop:
- br bool true, label %LoopCont, label %Out
-LoopCont:
- %X = add int 1, 0
- br bool true, label %Out, label %Loop
-
-Out:
- %V = phi int [ 2, %Loop], [ %X, %LoopCont]
- %V2 = sub int %V, 1
- ret int %V2
+Loop: ; preds = %LoopCont, %entry
+ br i1 true, label %LoopCont, label %Out
+LoopCont: ; preds = %Loop
+ %X = add i32 1, 0 ; <i32> [#uses=1]
+ br i1 true, label %Out, label %Loop
+Out: ; preds = %LoopCont, %Loop
+ %V = phi i32 [ 2, %Loop ], [ %X, %LoopCont ] ; <i32> [#uses=1]
+ %V2 = sub i32 %V, 1 ; <i32> [#uses=1]
+ ret i32 %V2
}
Modified: llvm/trunk/test/Transforms/LICM/2003-12-13-VolatilePromote.ll
URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/llvm/trunk/test/Transforms/LICM/2003-12-13-VolatilePromote.ll?rev=48527&r1=48526&r2=48527&view=diff
==============================================================================
--- llvm/trunk/test/Transforms/LICM/2003-12-13-VolatilePromote.ll (original)
+++ llvm/trunk/test/Transforms/LICM/2003-12-13-VolatilePromote.ll Tue Mar 18 22:47:13 2008
@@ -1,17 +1,16 @@
-; RUN: llvm-upgrade < %s | llvm-as | opt -licm | llvm-dis | %prcontext volatile 1 | grep Loop
+; RUN: llvm-as < %s | opt -licm | llvm-dis | %prcontext volatile 1 | grep Loop
-%X = global int 7
+ at X = global i32 7 ; <i32*> [#uses=2]
-void %testfunc(int %i) {
- br label %Loop
-
-Loop:
- %x = volatile load int* %X ; Should not promote this to a register
- %x2 = add int %x, 1
- store int %x2, int* %X
- br bool true, label %Out, label %Loop
-
-Out:
- ret void
+define void @testfunc(i32 %i) {
+ br label %Loop
+Loop: ; preds = %Loop, %0
+ ; Should not promote this to a register
+ %x = volatile load i32* @X ; <i32> [#uses=1]
+ %x2 = add i32 %x, 1 ; <i32> [#uses=1]
+ store i32 %x2, i32* @X
+ br i1 true, label %Out, label %Loop
+Out: ; preds = %Loop
+ ret void
}
Modified: llvm/trunk/test/Transforms/LICM/2004-09-14-AliasAnalysisInvalidate.llx
URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/llvm/trunk/test/Transforms/LICM/2004-09-14-AliasAnalysisInvalidate.llx?rev=48527&r1=48526&r2=48527&view=diff
==============================================================================
--- llvm/trunk/test/Transforms/LICM/2004-09-14-AliasAnalysisInvalidate.llx (original)
+++ llvm/trunk/test/Transforms/LICM/2004-09-14-AliasAnalysisInvalidate.llx Tue Mar 18 22:47:13 2008
@@ -1,22 +1,19 @@
-; RUN: llvm-upgrade < %s | llvm-as | opt -globalsmodref-aa -licm -disable-output
+; RUN: llvm-as < %s | opt -globalsmodref-aa -licm -disable-output
-%PL_regcomp_parse = internal global sbyte* null
+ at PL_regcomp_parse = internal global i8* null ; <i8**> [#uses=2]
-implementation
-
-void %test() {
- br label %Outer
-Outer:
- br label %Inner
-Inner:
- %tmp.114.i.i.i = load sbyte** %PL_regcomp_parse
- %tmp.115.i.i.i = load sbyte* %tmp.114.i.i.i
-
- store sbyte* null, sbyte** %PL_regcomp_parse
-
- br bool false, label %Inner, label %Next
-Next:
- br bool false, label %Outer, label %Exit
-Exit:
- ret void
+define void @test() {
+ br label %Outer
+Outer: ; preds = %Next, %0
+ br label %Inner
+Inner: ; preds = %Inner, %Outer
+ %tmp.114.i.i.i = load i8** @PL_regcomp_parse ; <i8*> [#uses=1]
+ %tmp.115.i.i.i = load i8* %tmp.114.i.i.i ; <i8> [#uses=0]
+ store i8* null, i8** @PL_regcomp_parse
+ br i1 false, label %Inner, label %Next
+Next: ; preds = %Inner
+ br i1 false, label %Outer, label %Exit
+Exit: ; preds = %Next
+ ret void
}
+
Modified: llvm/trunk/test/Transforms/LICM/2004-11-17-UndefIndexCrash.ll
URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/llvm/trunk/test/Transforms/LICM/2004-11-17-UndefIndexCrash.ll?rev=48527&r1=48526&r2=48527&view=diff
==============================================================================
--- llvm/trunk/test/Transforms/LICM/2004-11-17-UndefIndexCrash.ll (original)
+++ llvm/trunk/test/Transforms/LICM/2004-11-17-UndefIndexCrash.ll Tue Mar 18 22:47:13 2008
@@ -1,24 +1,20 @@
-; RUN: llvm-upgrade < %s | llvm-as | opt -licm -disable-output
+; RUN: llvm-as < %s | opt -licm -disable-output
+ %struct.roadlet = type { i8*, %struct.vehicle*, [8 x %struct.roadlet*], [8 x %struct.roadlet* (%struct.roadlet*, %struct.vehicle*, i32)*] }
+ %struct.vehicle = type { %struct.roadlet*, i8*, i32, i32, %union.._631., i32 }
+ %union.._631. = type { i32 }
- %struct.roadlet = type { sbyte*, %struct.vehicle*, [8 x %struct.roadlet*], [8 x %struct.roadlet* (%struct.roadlet*, %struct.vehicle*, int)*] }
- %struct.vehicle = type { %struct.roadlet*, sbyte*, int, int, %union.._631., int }
- %union.._631. = type { int }
+declare %struct.roadlet* @_Z11return_nullP7roadletP7vehicle9direction(%struct.roadlet*, %struct.vehicle*, i32)
-implementation ; Functions:
+declare %struct.roadlet* @_Z14lane_switch_okP7roadletP7vehicle9direction(%struct.roadlet*, %struct.vehicle*, i32)
-declare %struct.roadlet* %_Z11return_nullP7roadletP7vehicle9direction(%struct.roadlet*, %struct.vehicle*, int)
-
-declare %struct.roadlet* %_Z14lane_switch_okP7roadletP7vehicle9direction(%struct.roadlet*, %struct.vehicle*, int)
-
-void %main() {
-__main.entry: ; preds = %invoke_cont.1
+define void @main() {
+__main.entry:
br label %invoke_cont.3
-
-invoke_cont.3: ; preds = %__main.entry, %invoke_cont.3
- %tmp.34.i.i502.7 = getelementptr %struct.roadlet* null, int 0, uint 3, int 7 ; <%struct.roadlet* (%struct.roadlet*, %struct.vehicle*, int)**> [#uses=1]
- store %struct.roadlet* (%struct.roadlet*, %struct.vehicle*, int)* %_Z11return_nullP7roadletP7vehicle9direction, %struct.roadlet* (%struct.roadlet*, %struct.vehicle*, int)** %tmp.34.i.i502.7
- store %struct.roadlet* (%struct.roadlet*, %struct.vehicle*, int)* %_Z14lane_switch_okP7roadletP7vehicle9direction, %struct.roadlet* (%struct.roadlet*, %struct.vehicle*, int)** null
- %tmp.4.i.i339 = getelementptr %struct.roadlet* null, int 0, uint 3, int undef ; <%struct.roadlet* (%struct.roadlet*, %struct.vehicle*, int)**> [#uses=1]
- store %struct.roadlet* (%struct.roadlet*, %struct.vehicle*, int)* %_Z11return_nullP7roadletP7vehicle9direction, %struct.roadlet* (%struct.roadlet*, %struct.vehicle*, int)** %tmp.4.i.i339
+invoke_cont.3: ; preds = %invoke_cont.3, %__main.entry
+ %tmp.34.i.i502.7 = getelementptr %struct.roadlet* null, i32 0, i32 3, i32 7 ; <%struct.roadlet* (%struct.roadlet*, %struct.vehicle*, i32)**> [#uses=1]
+ store %struct.roadlet* (%struct.roadlet*, %struct.vehicle*, i32)* @_Z11return_nullP7roadletP7vehicle9direction, %struct.roadlet* (%struct.roadlet*, %struct.vehicle*, i32)** %tmp.34.i.i502.7
+ store %struct.roadlet* (%struct.roadlet*, %struct.vehicle*, i32)* @_Z14lane_switch_okP7roadletP7vehicle9direction, %struct.roadlet* (%struct.roadlet*, %struct.vehicle*, i32)** null
+ %tmp.4.i.i339 = getelementptr %struct.roadlet* null, i32 0, i32 3, i32 undef ; <%struct.roadlet* (%struct.roadlet*, %struct.vehicle*, i32)**> [#uses=1]
+ store %struct.roadlet* (%struct.roadlet*, %struct.vehicle*, i32)* @_Z11return_nullP7roadletP7vehicle9direction, %struct.roadlet* (%struct.roadlet*, %struct.vehicle*, i32)** %tmp.4.i.i339
br label %invoke_cont.3
}
Modified: llvm/trunk/test/Transforms/LICM/2005-03-24-LICM-Aggregate-Crash.ll
URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/llvm/trunk/test/Transforms/LICM/2005-03-24-LICM-Aggregate-Crash.ll?rev=48527&r1=48526&r2=48527&view=diff
==============================================================================
--- llvm/trunk/test/Transforms/LICM/2005-03-24-LICM-Aggregate-Crash.ll (original)
+++ llvm/trunk/test/Transforms/LICM/2005-03-24-LICM-Aggregate-Crash.ll Tue Mar 18 22:47:13 2008
@@ -1,10 +1,9 @@
-; RUN: llvm-upgrade < %s | llvm-as | opt -licm -disable-output
+; RUN: llvm-as < %s | opt -licm -disable-output
-void %test({int}* %P) {
+define void @test({ i32 }* %P) {
br label %Loop
-
-Loop:
- free {int}* %P
+Loop: ; preds = %Loop, %0
+ free { i32 }* %P
br label %Loop
}
Modified: llvm/trunk/test/Transforms/LICM/2006-09-12-DeadUserOfSunkInstr.ll
URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/llvm/trunk/test/Transforms/LICM/2006-09-12-DeadUserOfSunkInstr.ll?rev=48527&r1=48526&r2=48527&view=diff
==============================================================================
--- llvm/trunk/test/Transforms/LICM/2006-09-12-DeadUserOfSunkInstr.ll (original)
+++ llvm/trunk/test/Transforms/LICM/2006-09-12-DeadUserOfSunkInstr.ll Tue Mar 18 22:47:13 2008
@@ -1,215 +1,148 @@
-; RUN: llvm-upgrade < %s | llvm-as | opt -licm -disable-output
+; RUN: llvm-as < %s | opt -licm -disable-output
; PR908
+; END.
- %struct.alloc_chain = type { sbyte*, %struct.alloc_chain* }
- %struct.oggpack_buffer = type { int, int, ubyte*, ubyte*, int }
- %struct.vorbis_block = type { float**, %struct.oggpack_buffer, int, int, int, int, int, int, long, long, %struct.vorbis_dsp_state*, sbyte*, int, int, int, %struct.alloc_chain*, int, int, int, int, sbyte* }
- %struct.vorbis_dsp_state = type { int, %struct.vorbis_info*, float**, float**, int, int, int, int, int, int, int, int, int, long, long, long, long, long, long, sbyte* }
- %struct.vorbis_info = type { int, int, int, int, int, int, int, sbyte* }
+ %struct.alloc_chain = type { i8*, %struct.alloc_chain* }
+ %struct.oggpack_buffer = type { i32, i32, i8*, i8*, i32 }
+ %struct.vorbis_block = type { float**, %struct.oggpack_buffer, i32, i32, i32, i32, i32, i32, i64, i64, %struct.vorbis_dsp_state*, i8*, i32, i32, i32, %struct.alloc_chain*, i32, i32, i32, i32, i8* }
+ %struct.vorbis_dsp_state = type { i32, %struct.vorbis_info*, float**, float**, i32, i32, i32, i32, i32, i32, i32, i32, i32, i64, i64, i64, i64, i64, i64, i8* }
+ %struct.vorbis_info = type { i32, i32, i32, i32, i32, i32, i32, i8* }
-implementation ; Functions:
-
-fastcc void %_01forward() {
+define fastcc void @_01forward() {
entry:
- br bool false, label %bb222.preheader, label %bb241
-
+ br i1 false, label %bb222.preheader, label %bb241
cond_true67: ; preds = %cond_true87
br label %cond_next80
-
cond_next80: ; preds = %cond_true87, %cond_true67
br label %bb83
-
bb83.preheader: ; preds = %cond_true226
- br bool false, label %bb83.us.preheader, label %bb83.preheader1
-
+ br i1 false, label %bb83.us.preheader, label %bb83.preheader1
bb83.us.preheader: ; preds = %bb83.preheader
br label %bb83.us
-
bb83.us: ; preds = %cond_next80.us, %bb83.us.preheader
- br bool false, label %cond_true87.us, label %cond_next92.loopexit2
-
+ br i1 false, label %cond_true87.us, label %cond_next92.loopexit2
cond_next80.us: ; preds = %bb59.loopexit.us, %cond_true67.us
br label %bb83.us
-
cond_true67.us: ; preds = %bb59.loopexit.us
br label %cond_next80.us
-
cond_next.us: ; preds = %cond_true56.us, %cond_true38.us
- br bool false, label %cond_true56.us, label %bb59.loopexit.us
-
+ br i1 false, label %cond_true56.us, label %bb59.loopexit.us
cond_true38.us: ; preds = %cond_true56.us
br label %cond_next.us
-
cond_true56.us: ; preds = %cond_true87.us, %cond_next.us
- br bool false, label %cond_true38.us, label %cond_next.us
-
+ br i1 false, label %cond_true38.us, label %cond_next.us
cond_true87.us: ; preds = %bb83.us
br label %cond_true56.us
-
bb59.loopexit.us: ; preds = %cond_next.us
- br bool false, label %cond_true67.us, label %cond_next80.us
-
+ br i1 false, label %cond_true67.us, label %cond_next80.us
bb83.preheader1: ; preds = %bb83.preheader
br label %bb83
-
bb83: ; preds = %bb83.preheader1, %cond_next80
- br bool false, label %cond_next92.loopexit, label %cond_true87
-
+ br i1 false, label %cond_next92.loopexit, label %cond_true87
cond_true87: ; preds = %bb83
- br bool false, label %cond_true67, label %cond_next80
-
+ br i1 false, label %cond_true67, label %cond_next80
cond_next92.loopexit: ; preds = %bb83
br label %cond_next92
-
cond_next92.loopexit2: ; preds = %bb83.us
br label %cond_next92
-
cond_next92: ; preds = %cond_true226, %cond_next92.loopexit2, %cond_next92.loopexit
- br bool false, label %cond_true218.loopexit, label %bb222
-
+ br i1 false, label %cond_true218.loopexit, label %bb222
cond_true139: ; preds = %cond_true202
- br bool false, label %cond_next195, label %cond_true155
-
+ br i1 false, label %cond_next195, label %cond_true155
cond_true155: ; preds = %cond_true139
- br bool false, label %cond_true249.i.preheader, label %_encodepart.exit
-
+ br i1 false, label %cond_true249.i.preheader, label %_encodepart.exit
cond_true.i: ; preds = %cond_true115.i
- br bool false, label %bb60.i.preheader, label %cond_next97.i
-
+ br i1 false, label %bb60.i.preheader, label %cond_next97.i
bb60.i.preheader: ; preds = %cond_true.i
br label %bb60.i
-
bb60.i: ; preds = %cond_true63.i, %bb60.i.preheader
- br bool false, label %cond_true63.i, label %cond_next97.i.loopexit
-
+ br i1 false, label %cond_true63.i, label %cond_next97.i.loopexit
cond_true63.i: ; preds = %bb60.i
- br bool false, label %bb60.i, label %cond_next97.i.loopexit
-
+ br i1 false, label %bb60.i, label %cond_next97.i.loopexit
bb86.i.preheader: ; preds = %cond_true115.i
br label %bb86.i
-
bb86.i: ; preds = %cond_true93.i, %bb86.i.preheader
- br bool false, label %cond_true93.i, label %cond_next97.i.loopexit3
-
+ br i1 false, label %cond_true93.i, label %cond_next97.i.loopexit3
cond_true93.i: ; preds = %bb86.i
- br bool false, label %cond_next97.i.loopexit3, label %bb86.i
-
+ br i1 false, label %cond_next97.i.loopexit3, label %bb86.i
cond_next97.i.loopexit: ; preds = %cond_true63.i, %bb60.i
br label %cond_next97.i
-
cond_next97.i.loopexit3: ; preds = %cond_true93.i, %bb86.i
br label %cond_next97.i
-
cond_next97.i: ; preds = %cond_next97.i.loopexit3, %cond_next97.i.loopexit, %cond_true.i
- br bool false, label %bb118.i.loopexit, label %cond_true115.i
-
+ br i1 false, label %bb118.i.loopexit, label %cond_true115.i
cond_true115.i.preheader: ; preds = %cond_true249.i
br label %cond_true115.i
-
cond_true115.i: ; preds = %cond_true115.i.preheader, %cond_next97.i
- br bool false, label %cond_true.i, label %bb86.i.preheader
-
+ br i1 false, label %cond_true.i, label %bb86.i.preheader
bb118.i.loopexit: ; preds = %cond_next97.i
br label %bb118.i
-
bb118.i: ; preds = %cond_true249.i, %bb118.i.loopexit
- br bool false, label %cond_next204.i, label %cond_true128.i
-
+ br i1 false, label %cond_next204.i, label %cond_true128.i
cond_true128.i: ; preds = %bb118.i
- br bool false, label %cond_true199.i.preheader, label %cond_next204.i
-
+ br i1 false, label %cond_true199.i.preheader, label %cond_next204.i
cond_true199.i.preheader: ; preds = %cond_true128.i
br label %cond_true199.i
-
cond_true199.i.us: ; No predecessors!
- br bool false, label %cond_true167.i.us, label %cond_next187.i.us
-
+ br i1 false, label %cond_true167.i.us, label %cond_next187.i.us
cond_next187.i.us: ; preds = %bb170.i.loopexit.us, %bb170.i.us.cond_next187.i.us_crit_edge, %cond_true199.i.us
unreachable
-
bb170.i.us.cond_next187.i.us_crit_edge: ; preds = %bb170.i.loopexit.us
br label %cond_next187.i.us
-
cond_true167.i.us: ; preds = %cond_true167.i.us, %cond_true199.i.us
- br bool false, label %cond_true167.i.us, label %bb170.i.loopexit.us
-
+ br i1 false, label %cond_true167.i.us, label %bb170.i.loopexit.us
bb170.i.loopexit.us: ; preds = %cond_true167.i.us
- br bool false, label %cond_next187.i.us, label %bb170.i.us.cond_next187.i.us_crit_edge
-
+ br i1 false, label %cond_next187.i.us, label %bb170.i.us.cond_next187.i.us_crit_edge
cond_true199.i: ; preds = %cond_true199.i, %cond_true199.i.preheader
- br bool false, label %cond_next204.i.loopexit, label %cond_true199.i
-
+ br i1 false, label %cond_next204.i.loopexit, label %cond_true199.i
cond_next204.i.loopexit: ; preds = %cond_true199.i
br label %cond_next204.i
-
cond_next204.i: ; preds = %cond_next204.i.loopexit, %cond_true128.i, %bb118.i
br label %bb233.i
-
cond_true230.i: ; No predecessors!
- %exitcond155 = seteq uint 0, %tmp16.i ; <bool> [#uses=0]
+ %exitcond155 = icmp eq i32 0, %tmp16.i ; <i1> [#uses=0]
unreachable
-
bb233.i: ; preds = %cond_next204.i
- br bool false, label %_encodepart.exit.loopexit, label %cond_true249.i
-
+ br i1 false, label %_encodepart.exit.loopexit, label %cond_true249.i
cond_true249.i.preheader: ; preds = %cond_true155
br label %cond_true249.i
-
cond_true249.i: ; preds = %cond_true249.i.preheader, %bb233.i
- %tmp16.i = cast int 0 to uint ; <uint> [#uses=1]
- br bool false, label %cond_true115.i.preheader, label %bb118.i
-
+ %tmp16.i = bitcast i32 0 to i32 ; <i32> [#uses=1]
+ br i1 false, label %cond_true115.i.preheader, label %bb118.i
_encodepart.exit.loopexit: ; preds = %bb233.i
br label %_encodepart.exit
-
_encodepart.exit: ; preds = %_encodepart.exit.loopexit, %cond_true155
br label %cond_next195
-
cond_next195: ; preds = %cond_true202, %_encodepart.exit, %cond_true139
- br bool false, label %bb205.loopexit, label %cond_true202
-
+ br i1 false, label %bb205.loopexit, label %cond_true202
cond_true202.preheader: ; preds = %cond_true218
br label %cond_true202
-
cond_true202: ; preds = %cond_true202.preheader, %cond_next195
- br bool false, label %cond_next195, label %cond_true139
-
+ br i1 false, label %cond_next195, label %cond_true139
bb205.loopexit: ; preds = %cond_next195
br label %bb205
-
bb205: ; preds = %cond_true218, %bb205.loopexit
- br bool false, label %cond_true218, label %bb222.outer105.loopexit
-
+ br i1 false, label %cond_true218, label %bb222.outer105.loopexit
cond_true218.loopexit: ; preds = %cond_next92
br label %cond_true218
-
cond_true218: ; preds = %cond_true218.loopexit, %bb205
- br bool false, label %cond_true202.preheader, label %bb205
-
+ br i1 false, label %cond_true202.preheader, label %bb205
bb222.preheader: ; preds = %entry
br label %bb222.outer
-
bb222.outer: ; preds = %bb229, %bb222.preheader
br label %bb222.outer105
-
bb222.outer105.loopexit: ; preds = %bb205
br label %bb222.outer105
-
bb222.outer105: ; preds = %bb222.outer105.loopexit, %bb222.outer
br label %bb222
-
bb222: ; preds = %bb222.outer105, %cond_next92
- br bool false, label %cond_true226, label %bb229
-
+ br i1 false, label %cond_true226, label %bb229
cond_true226: ; preds = %bb222
- br bool false, label %bb83.preheader, label %cond_next92
-
+ br i1 false, label %bb83.preheader, label %cond_next92
bb229: ; preds = %bb222
- br bool false, label %bb222.outer, label %bb241.loopexit
-
+ br i1 false, label %bb222.outer, label %bb241.loopexit
bb241.loopexit: ; preds = %bb229
br label %bb241
-
bb241: ; preds = %bb241.loopexit, %entry
ret void
}
Modified: llvm/trunk/test/Transforms/LICM/basictest.ll
URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/llvm/trunk/test/Transforms/LICM/basictest.ll?rev=48527&r1=48526&r2=48527&view=diff
==============================================================================
--- llvm/trunk/test/Transforms/LICM/basictest.ll (original)
+++ llvm/trunk/test/Transforms/LICM/basictest.ll Tue Mar 18 22:47:13 2008
@@ -1,17 +1,15 @@
-; RUN: llvm-upgrade < %s | llvm-as | opt -licm | llvm-dis
-
-void "testfunc"(int %i) {
+; RUN: llvm-as < %s | opt -licm | llvm-dis
+define void @testfunc(i32 %i) {
+; <label>:0
br label %Loop
-
-Loop:
- %j = phi uint [0, %0], [%Next, %Loop]
- %i = cast int %i to uint
- %i2 = mul uint %i, 17
- %Next = add uint %j, %i2
- %cond = seteq uint %Next, 0
- br bool %cond, label %Out, label %Loop
-
-Out:
+Loop: ; preds = %Loop, %0
+ %j = phi i32 [ 0, %0 ], [ %Next, %Loop ] ; <i32> [#uses=1]
+ %i2 = mul i32 %i, 17 ; <i32> [#uses=1]
+ %Next = add i32 %j, %i2 ; <i32> [#uses=2]
+ %cond = icmp eq i32 %Next, 0 ; <i1> [#uses=1]
+ br i1 %cond, label %Out, label %Loop
+Out: ; preds = %Loop
ret void
}
+
Modified: llvm/trunk/test/Transforms/LICM/no-preheader-test.ll
URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/llvm/trunk/test/Transforms/LICM/no-preheader-test.ll?rev=48527&r1=48526&r2=48527&view=diff
==============================================================================
--- llvm/trunk/test/Transforms/LICM/no-preheader-test.ll (original)
+++ llvm/trunk/test/Transforms/LICM/no-preheader-test.ll Tue Mar 18 22:47:13 2008
@@ -1,21 +1,20 @@
; Test that LICM works when there is not a loop-preheader
-; RUN: llvm-upgrade < %s | llvm-as | opt -licm | llvm-dis
+; RUN: llvm-as < %s | opt -licm | llvm-dis
-void "testfunc"(int %i.s, bool %ifcond) {
- br bool %ifcond, label %Then, label %Else
-Then:
+define void @testfunc(i32 %i.s, i1 %ifcond) {
+ br i1 %ifcond, label %Then, label %Else
+Then: ; preds = %0
br label %Loop
-Else:
+Else: ; preds = %0
br label %Loop
-
-Loop:
- %j = phi uint [0, %Then], [12, %Else], [%Next, %Loop]
- %i = cast int %i.s to uint
- %i2 = mul uint %i, 17
- %Next = add uint %j, %i2
- %cond = seteq uint %Next, 0
- br bool %cond, label %Out, label %Loop
-
-Out:
+Loop: ; preds = %Loop, %Else, %Then
+ %j = phi i32 [ 0, %Then ], [ 12, %Else ], [ %Next, %Loop ] ; <i32> [#uses=1]
+ %i = bitcast i32 %i.s to i32 ; <i32> [#uses=1]
+ %i2 = mul i32 %i, 17 ; <i32> [#uses=1]
+ %Next = add i32 %j, %i2 ; <i32> [#uses=2]
+ %cond = icmp eq i32 %Next, 0 ; <i1> [#uses=1]
+ br i1 %cond, label %Out, label %Loop
+Out: ; preds = %Loop
ret void
}
+
Modified: llvm/trunk/test/Transforms/LICM/sink_critical_edge.ll
URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/llvm/trunk/test/Transforms/LICM/sink_critical_edge.ll?rev=48527&r1=48526&r2=48527&view=diff
==============================================================================
--- llvm/trunk/test/Transforms/LICM/sink_critical_edge.ll (original)
+++ llvm/trunk/test/Transforms/LICM/sink_critical_edge.ll Tue Mar 18 22:47:13 2008
@@ -1,19 +1,16 @@
; This testcase checks to make sure the sinker does not cause problems with
; critical edges.
-; RUN: llvm-upgrade < %s | llvm-as | opt -licm | llvm-dis | %prcontext add 1 | grep Exit
+; RUN: llvm-as < %s | opt -licm | llvm-dis | %prcontext add 1 | grep Exit
-implementation ; Functions:
-
-void %test() {
+define void @test() {
Entry:
- br bool false, label %Loop, label %Exit
-
-Loop:
- %X = add int 0, 1
- br bool false, label %Loop, label %Exit
-
-Exit:
- %Y = phi int [ 0, %Entry ], [ %X, %Loop ]
+ br i1 false, label %Loop, label %Exit
+Loop: ; preds = %Loop, %Entry
+ %X = add i32 0, 1 ; <i32> [#uses=1]
+ br i1 false, label %Loop, label %Exit
+Exit: ; preds = %Loop, %Entry
+ %Y = phi i32 [ 0, %Entry ], [ %X, %Loop ] ; <i32> [#uses=0]
ret void
}
+
Modified: llvm/trunk/test/Transforms/LICM/sink_inst.ll
URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/llvm/trunk/test/Transforms/LICM/sink_inst.ll?rev=48527&r1=48526&r2=48527&view=diff
==============================================================================
--- llvm/trunk/test/Transforms/LICM/sink_inst.ll (original)
+++ llvm/trunk/test/Transforms/LICM/sink_inst.ll Tue Mar 18 22:47:13 2008
@@ -2,18 +2,19 @@
; the instruction to the exit blocks instead of executing it on every
; iteration of the loop.
;
-; RUN: llvm-upgrade < %s | llvm-as | opt -licm | llvm-dis | %prcontext mul 1 | grep Out:
+; RUN: llvm-as < %s | opt -licm | llvm-dis | %prcontext mul 1 | grep Out:
-int %test(int %N) {
+define i32 @test(i32 %N) {
Entry:
br label %Loop
-Loop:
- %N_addr.0.pn = phi int [ %dec, %Loop ], [ %N, %Entry ]
- %tmp.6 = mul int %N, %N_addr.0.pn
- %tmp.7 = sub int %tmp.6, %N
- %dec = add int %N_addr.0.pn, -1
- %tmp.1 = setne int %N_addr.0.pn, 1
- br bool %tmp.1, label %Loop, label %Out
-Out:
- ret int %tmp.7
+Loop: ; preds = %Loop, %Entry
+ %N_addr.0.pn = phi i32 [ %dec, %Loop ], [ %N, %Entry ] ; <i32> [#uses=3]
+ %tmp.6 = mul i32 %N, %N_addr.0.pn ; <i32> [#uses=1]
+ %tmp.7 = sub i32 %tmp.6, %N ; <i32> [#uses=1]
+ %dec = add i32 %N_addr.0.pn, -1 ; <i32> [#uses=1]
+ %tmp.1 = icmp ne i32 %N_addr.0.pn, 1 ; <i1> [#uses=1]
+ br i1 %tmp.1, label %Loop, label %Out
+Out: ; preds = %Loop
+ ret i32 %tmp.7
}
+
Modified: llvm/trunk/test/Transforms/LICM/sink_load.ll
URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/llvm/trunk/test/Transforms/LICM/sink_load.ll?rev=48527&r1=48526&r2=48527&view=diff
==============================================================================
--- llvm/trunk/test/Transforms/LICM/sink_load.ll (original)
+++ llvm/trunk/test/Transforms/LICM/sink_load.ll Tue Mar 18 22:47:13 2008
@@ -2,19 +2,20 @@
; result of the load is only used outside of the loop, sink the load instead of
; hoisting it!
;
-; RUN: llvm-upgrade < %s | llvm-as | opt -licm | llvm-dis | %prcontext load 1 | grep Out:
+; RUN: llvm-as < %s | opt -licm | llvm-dis | %prcontext load 1 | grep Out:
-%X = global int 5
+ at X = global i32 5 ; <i32*> [#uses=1]
-int %test(int %N) {
+define i32 @test(i32 %N) {
Entry:
br label %Loop
-Loop:
- %N_addr.0.pn = phi int [ %dec, %Loop ], [ %N, %Entry ]
- %tmp.6 = load int* %X
- %dec = add int %N_addr.0.pn, -1
- %tmp.1 = setne int %N_addr.0.pn, 1
- br bool %tmp.1, label %Loop, label %Out
-Out:
- ret int %tmp.6
+Loop: ; preds = %Loop, %Entry
+ %N_addr.0.pn = phi i32 [ %dec, %Loop ], [ %N, %Entry ] ; <i32> [#uses=2]
+ %tmp.6 = load i32* @X ; <i32> [#uses=1]
+ %dec = add i32 %N_addr.0.pn, -1 ; <i32> [#uses=1]
+ %tmp.1 = icmp ne i32 %N_addr.0.pn, 1 ; <i1> [#uses=1]
+ br i1 %tmp.1, label %Loop, label %Out
+Out: ; preds = %Loop
+ ret i32 %tmp.6
}
+
Modified: llvm/trunk/test/Transforms/LICM/sink_multiple.ll
URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/llvm/trunk/test/Transforms/LICM/sink_multiple.ll?rev=48527&r1=48526&r2=48527&view=diff
==============================================================================
--- llvm/trunk/test/Transforms/LICM/sink_multiple.ll (original)
+++ llvm/trunk/test/Transforms/LICM/sink_multiple.ll Tue Mar 18 22:47:13 2008
@@ -3,18 +3,19 @@
; instructions from the loop. Instead they got hoisted, which is better than
; leaving them in the loop, but increases register pressure pointlessly.
-; RUN: llvm-upgrade < %s | llvm-as | opt -licm | llvm-dis | \
+; RUN: llvm-as < %s | opt -licm | llvm-dis | \
; RUN: %prcontext getelementptr 1 | grep Out:
-%Ty = type { int, int }
-%X = external global %Ty
+ %Ty = type { i32, i32 }
+ at X = external global %Ty ; <%Ty*> [#uses=1]
-int %test() {
- br label %Loop
-Loop:
- %dead = getelementptr %Ty* %X, long 0, uint 0
- %sunk2 = load int* %dead
- br bool false, label %Loop, label %Out
-Out:
- ret int %sunk2
+define i32 @test() {
+ br label %Loop
+Loop: ; preds = %Loop, %0
+ %dead = getelementptr %Ty* @X, i64 0, i32 0 ; <i32*> [#uses=1]
+ %sunk2 = load i32* %dead ; <i32> [#uses=1]
+ br i1 false, label %Loop, label %Out
+Out: ; preds = %Loop
+ ret i32 %sunk2
}
+
Modified: llvm/trunk/test/Transforms/LICM/sink_multiple_exits.ll
URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/llvm/trunk/test/Transforms/LICM/sink_multiple_exits.ll?rev=48527&r1=48526&r2=48527&view=diff
==============================================================================
--- llvm/trunk/test/Transforms/LICM/sink_multiple_exits.ll (original)
+++ llvm/trunk/test/Transforms/LICM/sink_multiple_exits.ll Tue Mar 18 22:47:13 2008
@@ -1,23 +1,24 @@
; This testcase ensures that we can sink instructions from loops with
; multiple exits.
;
-; RUN: llvm-upgrade < %s | llvm-as | opt -licm | llvm-dis | \
+; RUN: llvm-as < %s | opt -licm | llvm-dis | \
; RUN: %prcontext mul 1 | grep {Out\[12\]:}
-int %test(int %N, bool %C) {
+define i32 @test(i32 %N, i1 %C) {
Entry:
br label %Loop
-Loop:
- %N_addr.0.pn = phi int [ %dec, %ContLoop ], [ %N, %Entry ]
- %tmp.6 = mul int %N, %N_addr.0.pn
- %tmp.7 = sub int %tmp.6, %N
- %dec = add int %N_addr.0.pn, -1
- br bool %C, label %ContLoop, label %Out1
-ContLoop:
- %tmp.1 = setne int %N_addr.0.pn, 1
- br bool %tmp.1, label %Loop, label %Out2
-Out1:
- ret int %tmp.7
-Out2:
- ret int %tmp.7
+Loop: ; preds = %ContLoop, %Entry
+ %N_addr.0.pn = phi i32 [ %dec, %ContLoop ], [ %N, %Entry ] ; <i32> [#uses=3]
+ %tmp.6 = mul i32 %N, %N_addr.0.pn ; <i32> [#uses=1]
+ %tmp.7 = sub i32 %tmp.6, %N ; <i32> [#uses=2]
+ %dec = add i32 %N_addr.0.pn, -1 ; <i32> [#uses=1]
+ br i1 %C, label %ContLoop, label %Out1
+ContLoop: ; preds = %Loop
+ %tmp.1 = icmp ne i32 %N_addr.0.pn, 1 ; <i1> [#uses=1]
+ br i1 %tmp.1, label %Loop, label %Out2
+Out1: ; preds = %Loop
+ ret i32 %tmp.7
+Out2: ; preds = %ContLoop
+ ret i32 %tmp.7
}
+
Modified: llvm/trunk/test/Transforms/LICM/sink_only_some_exits.ll
URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/llvm/trunk/test/Transforms/LICM/sink_only_some_exits.ll?rev=48527&r1=48526&r2=48527&view=diff
==============================================================================
--- llvm/trunk/test/Transforms/LICM/sink_only_some_exits.ll (original)
+++ llvm/trunk/test/Transforms/LICM/sink_only_some_exits.ll Tue Mar 18 22:47:13 2008
@@ -2,25 +2,22 @@
; some exits out of the loop, and that we can do so without breaking dominator
; info.
;
-; RUN: llvm-upgrade < %s | llvm-as | opt -licm | llvm-dis | \
+; RUN: llvm-as < %s | opt -licm | llvm-dis | \
; RUN: %prcontext add 1 | grep exit2:
-implementation ; Functions:
-
-int %test(bool %C1, bool %C2, int *%P, int* %Q) {
+define i32 @test(i1 %C1, i1 %C2, i32* %P, i32* %Q) {
Entry:
br label %Loop
-
-Loop:
- br bool %C1, label %Cont, label %exit1
-Cont:
- %X = load int* %P
- store int %X, int* %Q
- %V = add int %X, 1
- br bool %C2, label %Loop, label %exit2
-
-exit1:
- ret int 0
-exit2:
- ret int %V
+Loop: ; preds = %Cont, %Entry
+ br i1 %C1, label %Cont, label %exit1
+Cont: ; preds = %Loop
+ %X = load i32* %P ; <i32> [#uses=2]
+ store i32 %X, i32* %Q
+ %V = add i32 %X, 1 ; <i32> [#uses=1]
+ br i1 %C2, label %Loop, label %exit2
+exit1: ; preds = %Loop
+ ret i32 0
+exit2: ; preds = %Cont
+ ret i32 %V
}
+
Modified: llvm/trunk/test/Transforms/LICM/sink_phi_node_use.ll
URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/llvm/trunk/test/Transforms/LICM/sink_phi_node_use.ll?rev=48527&r1=48526&r2=48527&view=diff
==============================================================================
--- llvm/trunk/test/Transforms/LICM/sink_phi_node_use.ll (original)
+++ llvm/trunk/test/Transforms/LICM/sink_phi_node_use.ll Tue Mar 18 22:47:13 2008
@@ -1,28 +1,21 @@
-; RUN: llvm-upgrade < %s | llvm-as | opt -licm | llvm-dis | %prcontext add 1 | grep preheader.loopexit:
+; RUN: llvm-as < %s | opt -licm | llvm-dis | %prcontext add 1 | grep preheader.loopexit:
-implementation
-
-void %test() {
+define void @test() {
loopentry.2.i:
- br bool false, label %no_exit.1.i.preheader, label %loopentry.3.i.preheader
-
-no_exit.1.i.preheader:
+ br i1 false, label %no_exit.1.i.preheader, label %loopentry.3.i.preheader
+no_exit.1.i.preheader: ; preds = %loopentry.2.i
br label %no_exit.1.i
-
-no_exit.1.i:
- br bool false, label %return.i, label %endif.8.i
-
-endif.8.i:
- %inc.1.i = add int 0, 1
- br bool false, label %no_exit.1.i, label %loopentry.3.i.preheader.loopexit
-
-loopentry.3.i.preheader.loopexit:
+no_exit.1.i: ; preds = %endif.8.i, %no_exit.1.i.preheader
+ br i1 false, label %return.i, label %endif.8.i
+endif.8.i: ; preds = %no_exit.1.i
+ %inc.1.i = add i32 0, 1 ; <i32> [#uses=1]
+ br i1 false, label %no_exit.1.i, label %loopentry.3.i.preheader.loopexit
+loopentry.3.i.preheader.loopexit: ; preds = %endif.8.i
br label %loopentry.3.i.preheader
-
-loopentry.3.i.preheader:
- %arg_num.0.i.ph13000 = phi int [ 0, %loopentry.2.i ], [ %inc.1.i, %loopentry.3.i.preheader.loopexit ]
+loopentry.3.i.preheader: ; preds = %loopentry.3.i.preheader.loopexit, %loopentry.2.i
+ %arg_num.0.i.ph13000 = phi i32 [ 0, %loopentry.2.i ], [ %inc.1.i, %loopentry.3.i.preheader.loopexit ] ; <i32> [#uses=0]
ret void
-
-return.i:
+return.i: ; preds = %no_exit.1.i
ret void
}
+
Modified: llvm/trunk/test/Transforms/LICM/sink_trapping_inst.ll
URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/llvm/trunk/test/Transforms/LICM/sink_trapping_inst.ll?rev=48527&r1=48526&r2=48527&view=diff
==============================================================================
--- llvm/trunk/test/Transforms/LICM/sink_trapping_inst.ll (original)
+++ llvm/trunk/test/Transforms/LICM/sink_trapping_inst.ll Tue Mar 18 22:47:13 2008
@@ -1,17 +1,18 @@
; Potentially trapping instructions may be sunk as long as they are guaranteed
; to be executed.
;
-; RUN: llvm-upgrade < %s | llvm-as | opt -licm | llvm-dis | %prcontext div 1 | grep Out:
+; RUN: llvm-as < %s | opt -licm | llvm-dis | %prcontext div 1 | grep Out:
-int %test(int %N) {
+define i32 @test(i32 %N) {
Entry:
br label %Loop
-Loop:
- %N_addr.0.pn = phi int [ %dec, %Loop ], [ %N, %Entry ]
- %tmp.6 = div int %N, %N_addr.0.pn
- %dec = add int %N_addr.0.pn, -1
- %tmp.1 = setne int %N_addr.0.pn, 0
- br bool %tmp.1, label %Loop, label %Out
-Out:
- ret int %tmp.6
+Loop: ; preds = %Loop, %Entry
+ %N_addr.0.pn = phi i32 [ %dec, %Loop ], [ %N, %Entry ] ; <i32> [#uses=3]
+ %tmp.6 = sdiv i32 %N, %N_addr.0.pn ; <i32> [#uses=1]
+ %dec = add i32 %N_addr.0.pn, -1 ; <i32> [#uses=1]
+ %tmp.1 = icmp ne i32 %N_addr.0.pn, 0 ; <i1> [#uses=1]
+ br i1 %tmp.1, label %Loop, label %Out
+Out: ; preds = %Loop
+ ret i32 %tmp.6
}
+
More information about the llvm-commits
mailing list