[llvm-commits] Patch for review: Speeding up ScheduleDAG computations

[David Greene]

On Wednesday 05 March 2008 11:16, Roman Levenstein wrote:

> 1) I do run llvm/test tests. At the end I get some figures about the
> number of PASSED and UNEXPECTEDLY FAILED tests. This is fine. But is
> it guaranteed that UNEXPECTEDLY FAILED are introduced by my code or is
> it possible that due to some recent changes to the repository some of
> those tests just fail? If it is due to the changes in the repository,
> how do I know what are the figures without my changes, so that I can
> compare and see new failures introduced by my code? Are those numbers
> published anywhere, may be in the nightly tests results??? Or should I
> basically have to source trees: one for repository version and one for
> my local modifications and then run tests under both trees?

I find that the repository breaks rather a a lot.  So what I do is keep two
working copies: one official one and one with my changes.  I run tests
on both and compare the results.

Yep, it's a pain.  :(

                                               -Dave