[llvm-commits] [llvm] r47379 - /llvm/trunk/include/llvm/ADT/APInt.h

[Evan Cheng]

Yep I know it's useless. Consistency is what I sought. Thanks!

Evan

On Feb 20, 2008, at 11:21 AM, Chris Lattner wrote:

>
> On Feb 20, 2008, at 11:17 AM, Dan Gohman wrote:
>
>> Omitting the inline keyword seemed more consistent with other code
>> in APInt. But it appears APInt does use they keyword in a few places.
>> It's a function definition inside a class, so it doesn't really
>> matter.
>
> I'd prefer to be consistent, but agree it's useless.  How about
> removing all of the inline's in the class?
>
> -Chris
>
> _______________________________________________
> llvm-commits mailing list
> llvm-commits at cs.uiuc.edu
> http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvm-commits