[llvm-commits] [llvm] r44061 - /llvm/trunk/include/llvm/CodeGen/BreakCriticalMachineEdge.h

Owen Anderson resistor at mac.com
Tue Nov 13 11:56:28 PST 2007


Author: resistor
Date: Tue Nov 13 13:56:28 2007
New Revision: 44061

URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=44061&view=rev
Log:
Wow.  I definitely shouldn't write code when I'm tird.

Make my previous patch actually do what it was intended to do.

Modified:
    llvm/trunk/include/llvm/CodeGen/BreakCriticalMachineEdge.h

Modified: llvm/trunk/include/llvm/CodeGen/BreakCriticalMachineEdge.h
URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/llvm/trunk/include/llvm/CodeGen/BreakCriticalMachineEdge.h?rev=44061&r1=44060&r2=44061&view=diff

==============================================================================
--- llvm/trunk/include/llvm/CodeGen/BreakCriticalMachineEdge.h (original)
+++ llvm/trunk/include/llvm/CodeGen/BreakCriticalMachineEdge.h Tue Nov 13 13:56:28 2007
@@ -52,27 +52,16 @@
       break;
     }
     
-    // Scan the operands of this branch, finding all uses of this MBB
-    std::vector<unsigned> toRemove;
-    unsigned reg = 0;
+    // Scan the operands of this branch, replacing any uses of dst with
+    // crit_mbb.
     for (unsigned i = 0, e = mii->getNumOperands(); i != e; ++i) {
       MachineOperand & mo = mii->getOperand(i);
       if (mo.isMachineBasicBlock() &&
-          mo.getMachineBasicBlock() == dst)
-        reg = mii->getOperand(i-1).getReg();
-        toRemove.push_back(i-1);
+          mo.getMachineBasicBlock() == dst) {
+        found_branch = true;
+        mo.setMachineBasicBlock(crit_mbb);
+      }
     }
-    
-    // Remove all uses of this MBB
-    for (std::vector<unsigned>::reverse_iterator I = toRemove.rbegin(),
-         E = toRemove.rend(); I != E; ++I) {
-      mii->RemoveOperand(*I+1);
-      mii->RemoveOperand(*I);
-    }
-    
-    // Add a single use corresponding to the new MBB
-    mii->addRegOperand(reg, false);
-    mii->addMachineBasicBlockOperand(crit_mbb);
   }
 
   // TODO: This is tentative. It may be necessary to fix this code. Maybe
@@ -89,10 +78,26 @@
     if(mii->getOpcode() != TargetInstrInfo::PHI)
       break;
     
+    // Find the operands corresponding to the source block
+    std::vector<unsigned> toRemove;
+    unsigned reg = 0;
     for (unsigned u = 0; u != mii->getNumOperands(); ++u)
       if (mii->getOperand(u).isMachineBasicBlock() &&
-          mii->getOperand(u).getMachineBasicBlock() == src)
-        mii->getOperand(u).setMachineBasicBlock(crit_mbb);
+          mii->getOperand(u).getMachineBasicBlock() == src) {
+        reg = mii->getOperand(u-1).getReg();
+        toRemove.push_back(u-1);
+      }
+    
+    // Remove all uses of this MBB
+    for (std::vector<unsigned>::reverse_iterator I = toRemove.rbegin(),
+         E = toRemove.rend(); I != E; ++I) {
+      mii->RemoveOperand(*I+1);
+      mii->RemoveOperand(*I);
+    }
+    
+    // Add a single use corresponding to the new MBB
+    mii->addRegOperand(reg, false);
+    mii->addMachineBasicBlockOperand(crit_mbb);
   }
   
   return crit_mbb;





More information about the llvm-commits mailing list