[llvm-commits] REPOST: llvm-gcc expensive checks patch

[Chris Lattner]

On Jul 8, 2007, at 7:59 PM, Reid Spencer wrote:

> On Sun, 2007-07-08 at 19:27 -0700, Chris Lattner wrote:
>
>>
>> I'm not talking about getting llvm-top going.
>
> It is going. I can successfully build llvm and hlvm by checking out
> llvm-top and just doing:
>
> make build MODULE=hlvm
>
> Although I can't test hlvm because the repository doesn't have llvm- 
> gcc
> yet.

Again, I'm *not* talking about llvm-top.

>
>> That is orthogonal
>> from getting the basic web site restored to operational.
>
> Are we talking about llvm-gcc here or the website ?  If the web site,
> how's that going? When do you expect to have it working?

No, neither.

>>  I'd like to
>> be able to check out "test-suite" as projects/test-suite and have
>> that "just work" for example.
>
> That's a strange request. If you check it out and put it in
> projects/llvm-test it works just fine. When we build from llvm-top it
> will check it out and put it in a test-suite directory.  Again, I  
> don't
> see why this is a road block.

I just want the basic instructions on the web site to be *correct*,  
and for all the previous capabilities of the llvm project to be  
working.  e.g., links to the command guide being broken are very bad.

-Chris