[llvm-commits] CVS: llvm/test/Regression/Transforms/SCCP/2002-05-02-EdgeFailure.ll 2002-05-02-MissSecondInst.ll 2002-05-20-MissedIncomingValue.ll 2002-05-21-InvalidSimplify.ll 2002-08-30-GetElementPtrTest.ll 2003-06-24-OverdefinedPHIValue.ll 2003-08-26-InvokeHandling.ll basictest.ll sccptest.ll

[Misha Brukman]

Changes in directory llvm/test/Regression/Transforms/SCCP:

2002-05-02-EdgeFailure.ll updated: 1.2 -> 1.3
2002-05-02-MissSecondInst.ll updated: 1.2 -> 1.3
2002-05-20-MissedIncomingValue.ll updated: 1.1 -> 1.2
2002-05-21-InvalidSimplify.ll updated: 1.1 -> 1.2
2002-08-30-GetElementPtrTest.ll updated: 1.2 -> 1.3
2003-06-24-OverdefinedPHIValue.ll updated: 1.2 -> 1.3
2003-08-26-InvokeHandling.ll updated: 1.1 -> 1.2
basictest.ll updated: 1.2 -> 1.3
sccptest.ll updated: 1.4 -> 1.5

---
Log message:

Renamed `as' => `llvm-as', `dis' => `llvm-dis', `link' => `llvm-link'.


---
Diffs of the changes:

Index: llvm/test/Regression/Transforms/SCCP/2002-05-02-EdgeFailure.ll
diff -u llvm/test/Regression/Transforms/SCCP/2002-05-02-EdgeFailure.ll:1.2 llvm/test/Regression/Transforms/SCCP/2002-05-02-EdgeFailure.ll:1.3
--- llvm/test/Regression/Transforms/SCCP/2002-05-02-EdgeFailure.ll:1.2	Sat Jun 28 18:23:33 2003
+++ llvm/test/Regression/Transforms/SCCP/2002-05-02-EdgeFailure.ll	Tue Sep 16 10:29:49 2003
@@ -5,7 +5,7 @@
 ; real benchmark (mst from Olden benchmark, MakeGraph function).  When SCCP is
 ; fixed, this should be eliminated by a single SCCP application.
 ;
-; RUN: as < %s | opt -sccp | dis | not grep loop
+; RUN: llvm-as < %s | opt -sccp | llvm-dis | not grep loop
 
 int* %test() {
 bb1:


Index: llvm/test/Regression/Transforms/SCCP/2002-05-02-MissSecondInst.ll
diff -u llvm/test/Regression/Transforms/SCCP/2002-05-02-MissSecondInst.ll:1.2 llvm/test/Regression/Transforms/SCCP/2002-05-02-MissSecondInst.ll:1.3
--- llvm/test/Regression/Transforms/SCCP/2002-05-02-MissSecondInst.ll:1.2	Sat Jun 28 18:23:33 2003
+++ llvm/test/Regression/Transforms/SCCP/2002-05-02-MissSecondInst.ll	Tue Sep 16 10:29:49 2003
@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
-; RUN: as < %s | opt -sccp | dis | not grep sub
+; RUN: llvm-as < %s | opt -sccp | llvm-dis | not grep sub
 
 void %test3(int, int) {
 	add int 0, 0


Index: llvm/test/Regression/Transforms/SCCP/2002-05-20-MissedIncomingValue.ll
diff -u llvm/test/Regression/Transforms/SCCP/2002-05-20-MissedIncomingValue.ll:1.1 llvm/test/Regression/Transforms/SCCP/2002-05-20-MissedIncomingValue.ll:1.2
--- llvm/test/Regression/Transforms/SCCP/2002-05-20-MissedIncomingValue.ll:1.1	Mon May 20 15:48:24 2002
+++ llvm/test/Regression/Transforms/SCCP/2002-05-20-MissedIncomingValue.ll	Tue Sep 16 10:29:49 2003
@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
 ; This test shows a case where SCCP is incorrectly eliminating the PHI node
 ; because it thinks it has a constant 0 value, when it really doesn't.
 
-; RUN: as < %s | opt -sccp | dis | grep phi
+; RUN: llvm-as < %s | opt -sccp | llvm-dis | grep phi
 
 int "test"(int %A, bool %c) {
 bb1:


Index: llvm/test/Regression/Transforms/SCCP/2002-05-21-InvalidSimplify.ll
diff -u llvm/test/Regression/Transforms/SCCP/2002-05-21-InvalidSimplify.ll:1.1 llvm/test/Regression/Transforms/SCCP/2002-05-21-InvalidSimplify.ll:1.2
--- llvm/test/Regression/Transforms/SCCP/2002-05-21-InvalidSimplify.ll:1.1	Tue May 21 17:23:38 2002
+++ llvm/test/Regression/Transforms/SCCP/2002-05-21-InvalidSimplify.ll	Tue Sep 16 10:29:49 2003
@@ -2,7 +2,7 @@
 ; this is in fact NOT the case, so the return should still be alive in the code
 ; after sccp and CFG simplification have been performed.
 ;
-; RUN: as < %s | opt -sccp -simplifycfg | dis | grep ret
+; RUN: llvm-as < %s | opt -sccp -simplifycfg | llvm-dis | grep ret
 
 
 void "old_main"() {


Index: llvm/test/Regression/Transforms/SCCP/2002-08-30-GetElementPtrTest.ll
diff -u llvm/test/Regression/Transforms/SCCP/2002-08-30-GetElementPtrTest.ll:1.2 llvm/test/Regression/Transforms/SCCP/2002-08-30-GetElementPtrTest.ll:1.3
--- llvm/test/Regression/Transforms/SCCP/2002-08-30-GetElementPtrTest.ll:1.2	Sat Jun 28 18:23:33 2003
+++ llvm/test/Regression/Transforms/SCCP/2002-08-30-GetElementPtrTest.ll	Tue Sep 16 10:29:49 2003
@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
-; RUN: as < %s | opt -sccp | dis | not grep '%X'
+; RUN: llvm-as < %s | opt -sccp | llvm-dis | not grep '%X'
 
 %G = uninitialized global [40x int]
 


Index: llvm/test/Regression/Transforms/SCCP/2003-06-24-OverdefinedPHIValue.ll
diff -u llvm/test/Regression/Transforms/SCCP/2003-06-24-OverdefinedPHIValue.ll:1.2 llvm/test/Regression/Transforms/SCCP/2003-06-24-OverdefinedPHIValue.ll:1.3
--- llvm/test/Regression/Transforms/SCCP/2003-06-24-OverdefinedPHIValue.ll:1.2	Sat Jun 28 18:23:33 2003
+++ llvm/test/Regression/Transforms/SCCP/2003-06-24-OverdefinedPHIValue.ll	Tue Sep 16 10:29:49 2003
@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
-; RUN: as < %s | opt -sccp -simplifycfg | dis | not grep then:
+; RUN: llvm-as < %s | opt -sccp -simplifycfg | llvm-dis | not grep then:
 
 void %cprop_test11(int* %data.1) {
 entry:		; No predecessors!


Index: llvm/test/Regression/Transforms/SCCP/2003-08-26-InvokeHandling.ll
diff -u llvm/test/Regression/Transforms/SCCP/2003-08-26-InvokeHandling.ll:1.1 llvm/test/Regression/Transforms/SCCP/2003-08-26-InvokeHandling.ll:1.2
--- llvm/test/Regression/Transforms/SCCP/2003-08-26-InvokeHandling.ll:1.1	Tue Aug 26 20:05:19 2003
+++ llvm/test/Regression/Transforms/SCCP/2003-08-26-InvokeHandling.ll	Tue Sep 16 10:29:49 2003
@@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
 ; The PHI cannot be eliminated from this testcase, SCCP is mishandling invoke's!
-; RUN: as < %s | opt -sccp | dis | grep phi
+; RUN: llvm-as < %s | opt -sccp | llvm-dis | grep phi
 
 declare void %foo()
 int %test(bool %cond) {


Index: llvm/test/Regression/Transforms/SCCP/basictest.ll
diff -u llvm/test/Regression/Transforms/SCCP/basictest.ll:1.2 llvm/test/Regression/Transforms/SCCP/basictest.ll:1.3
--- llvm/test/Regression/Transforms/SCCP/basictest.ll:1.2	Sat Jun 28 18:23:33 2003
+++ llvm/test/Regression/Transforms/SCCP/basictest.ll	Tue Sep 16 10:29:49 2003
@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
 ; This is a basic sanity check for constant propogation.  The add instruction 
 ; should be eliminated.
 
-; RUN: as < %s | opt -sccp | dis | not grep add
+; RUN: llvm-as < %s | opt -sccp | llvm-dis | not grep add
 
 int %test(bool %B) {
 	br bool %B, label %BB1, label %BB2


Index: llvm/test/Regression/Transforms/SCCP/sccptest.ll
diff -u llvm/test/Regression/Transforms/SCCP/sccptest.ll:1.4 llvm/test/Regression/Transforms/SCCP/sccptest.ll:1.5
--- llvm/test/Regression/Transforms/SCCP/sccptest.ll:1.4	Sat Jun 28 18:23:33 2003
+++ llvm/test/Regression/Transforms/SCCP/sccptest.ll	Tue Sep 16 10:29:49 2003
@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
 ; This is the test case taken from appel's book that illustrates a hard case
 ; that SCCP gets right. BB3 should be completely eliminated.
 ;
-; RUN: as < %s | opt -sccp -constprop -dce -cfgsimplify | dis | not grep BB3
+; RUN: llvm-as < %s | opt -sccp -constprop -dce -cfgsimplify | llvm-dis | not grep BB3
 
 int %test function(int %i0, int %j0) {
 BB1: