<table border="1" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="8">
    <tr>
        <th>Issue</th>
        <td>
            <a href=https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/141683>141683</a>
        </td>
    </tr>

    <tr>
        <th>Summary</th>
        <td>
            [clang-doc] Add tests for missing clang-doc output
        </td>
    </tr>

    <tr>
      <th>Labels</th>
      <td>
            clang-doc
      </td>
    </tr>

    <tr>
      <th>Assignees</th>
      <td>
            evelez7
      </td>
    </tr>

    <tr>
      <th>Reporter</th>
      <td>
          ilovepi
      </td>
    </tr>
</table>

<pre>
    The tests in clang-doc do not cover many cases for functions, templates, concepts, and many more C++ constructs.

Functions/methods do not test:
- `noexpect`
- `throw()`
- `const`
- `constexpr`
- `consteval`
- ...

Templates do not test constraints like the following:
```cpp
template <class T = void>
class C {};
```

We should improve testing for functions and templates in the cases that we know about.

</pre>
<img width="1" height="1" alt="" src="http://email.email.llvm.org/o/eJxkkt2O2yAQhZ8G34xiYfDvhS_y0zzBSr0mMLbpYrAMdnb79BWOs9m2UqSYI2bmY84R3uveIrakOBHGcEWDvyvCGCkuiVjC4OZWG7fipJObU5_t24AQ0AcP2oI0wvYH5SQoB9YFkG7FGUZhP0EKjx46N0O3WBm0s56wMwQcJyMCbgfprMQpbN_Cqkfh6GaEM2Enwk7xhg_zIoNPCT0Sery-ml1HDINT_jk8YhEeLx2AlNQ6_JhQBlLSpxSG2d0JqwlrvqnbjH_P-DHN_2mrME8tTXegt-eDvmPs3ELb4MHod4QwIHTOGHfXtn9QxlbbT04TocfnZoDwszTCe3gDwi-wOq0I_0Ho8aGegVQnUl0IP31v8qD5ieAHtxgFepxmtz7M0rb_24lt219WRCsj38OyMIgAd4R36-4gbm4J8aWJarlqeCMSbLMqr3ldNkWZDG0lVVZ0uaK8w5rmBetEVldNUVNFm7oqEt0yygpasIpxyniZUswyQZu8kx0vb3VDcoqj0CY1Zh1TN_eJ9n7BNsuzsuaJETc0fg_oV-L2iM5tLDrclt6TnBrtg3-1CTqYLdmvquICR6X2BMeVjNr7uJ5XlN0SpiUky2zaIYTJR7PYlbBrr8Ow3FLpRsKuccj-d5hm9ysGjV038BjNnX1t2Z8AAAD__y_wE4U">