<table border="1" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="8">
    <tr>
        <th>Issue</th>
        <td>
            <a href=https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/140601>140601</a>
        </td>
    </tr>

    <tr>
        <th>Summary</th>
        <td>
            clang-format of LLVM StringSwitch not good
        </td>
    </tr>

    <tr>
      <th>Labels</th>
      <td>
            clang-format
      </td>
    </tr>

    <tr>
      <th>Assignees</th>
      <td>
      </td>
    </tr>

    <tr>
      <th>Reporter</th>
      <td>
          jurahul
      </td>
    </tr>
</table>

<pre>
    LLVM's `StringSwitch` is not formatted well by clang-format. See https://discourse.llvm.org/t/issues-with-clang-format-of-llvm-stringswitch/86359

This issue is to investigate if this can be improved when there is a chain on function calls on the same onject.
</pre>
<img width="1" height="1" alt="" src="http://email.email.llvm.org/o/eJxUkU2PpCAQhn8NXioaxI_WA4febDzNnnqzd8BSmCB0oOzO_PuNzmS290RSUG8e3kfl7NaAKFn3g3U_C7WTjUm-70nZ3Rc6zh_y7e3PLyYuGVjPb5RcWG9PR8aynoPLECLBEtOmiHCGJ3oP-gOMV2EtP-cV3BDBEt0za65MTExMs8sm7ilj5f1jq2JamZiIicnlvGMun45s-RpSxqU8npb5RMifCGIa-qYbGb8yfv1tXYZz_-CiCC48MJNbFSG4Bei4NyqARnDbPcXHAWwxAFlM55ICY5ULEAMsezDkYgCjvM_HhCxCVhtCDO9oqCpm2cxjM6oCZX1pL_3Q8nEorOzQtJ2Zl3GZ21Y0elBLN9R6UWgajY0onBRcdLyrx3psh3qotKlRjcjHcVF102nWctyU89_tFOe_ZN3ynteFVxp9PqUJ8doSE-LQmORZld7XzFruXab8L4kceZSvWxAXOCzDq95T7BrjXOzJy__trY7srisTNyamI_jrKO8pHtV8e2Ri-kJ-SPE3AAD__wCtz8g">