<table border="1" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="8">
<tr>
<th>Issue</th>
<td>
<a href=https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/75751>75751</a>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th>Summary</th>
<td>
reporting bad coverage for code in unevaluated context
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th>Labels</th>
<td>
new issue
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th>Assignees</th>
<td>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th>Reporter</th>
<td>
hanickadot
</td>
</tr>
</table>
<pre>
Dear LLVM developers! I noticed bad code-coverage for code in unevaluated context. Like when constexpr function is called in `decltype(...)` or even in concepts:
<img width="1081" alt="Screenshot 2023-12-17 at 22 16 51" src="https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/assets/6557263/10b6884a-b7fd-4e52-9973-82e5e51efbb0">
Such code shouldn't be marked uncovered.
</pre>
<img width="1px" height="1px" alt="" src="http://email.email.llvm.org/o/eJyUUsuO3CgU_Rq8ubIFFz8XXsxMTUmROquWsudxyyZNgQW4uvvvI7vTSpbJBqTDAe55qJzdEohm1v3Lukul9rLGNK8qOPOibCyVjvZ9vpBK8PT07StYepCPG6XMUMAXCLE4Qxa0smCipdrEByW1ENxiOhFwAfZAD-V3VehghUJvpYEn90LwulI4oFzobUtw24MpLgZwGYzynuxxnfXckvHlfSOGY9M0DCfWc4gJ6EHhoJgYDG0lM_kP4xfGP1f5n7sv8OpsWZm8METBR8EQQfnyATybRBTyGgsgR1kLrMUAqgAiiB66k52T-WCvpWznJ3hleF1cWXfdmHhnePX-8bnVW4rfyRSGV5Uzlczw2nfdgL1keBVc9-PYqloPN1u31GE9TYOsR6SOOkE3rTlDZPL_36U872b9MDSvcfc2MBwKaIK7Si9kYQ-n9WSbys7STnJSFc1i4Di2YyuxWueRT5PsJttyRUZPUvTUGsmnGwltbhYrNx8WCBQDChwENmTkNFB_GzutEblkLae7cr45VDYxLZXLead56IZOVF5p8vnsEmKgVzgPDyndpUrz6Yzel8xa7l0u-dcrxRVPc6ItpuLC8rNOf9akak9-_utcztGOXM7RfwQAAP__jvX1SQ">