<table border="1" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="8">
    <tr>
        <th>Issue</th>
        <td>
            <a href=https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/62564>62564</a>
        </td>
    </tr>

    <tr>
        <th>Summary</th>
        <td>
            Please backport d9683a70fef4 into 16.0.X
        </td>
    </tr>

    <tr>
      <th>Labels</th>
      <td>
            backend:RISC-V,
            release:backport
      </td>
    </tr>

    <tr>
      <th>Assignees</th>
      <td>
      </td>
    </tr>

    <tr>
      <th>Reporter</th>
      <td>
          frasercrmck
      </td>
    </tr>
</table>

<pre>
    This is admittedly preemptive but given our downstream makes heavy use of RISC-V vector code, I think cherry-picking d9683a70fef would be prudent given it's fixing a known codegen issue.

The code it's fixing made it into LLVM 16 as db3f3243bb85253eaf0e483452fdbfd5baf7ffd1.

CC @asb, @topperc @bubba 
</pre>
<img width="1px" height="1px" alt="" src="http://email.email.llvm.org/o/eJxcUU2PmzAU_DXm8hRknjGEA4c0q0grbaWqXa16tfEzuAGMbJNt_n0F6aofF9vyvJnRvFExun4mapn8xORTptY0-NDaoCKFLkzdNdPe3NvXwUVwEZSZXEpkxjssgWhakrsR6DVB7240g18DGP8-xxRITTCpK0UYSN3usEYCb-Hr87fz4Q1u1CUfoPOGGJ7hGdLg5it0A4VwPyyuu7q5B9NUR6FqbsnCu19HA5pgCauh-cPRJYZ1BOt-bgQF19m_z7tuv6ExrpQz_sT46XG-DrSj_xEntX-Bm5OHl5e3z1BUoCIYLazAUmh9lCgFKcupPIpSojXaGqmVra01xT8e5zOwkquot2is5MkvC4Vue-pVawWZaYVpRKMyaovqKLBuCiyyoS04odFaY01d3QiJqLSy6miNQcWVzVyLHAWXXPJGIC_y0lJXygZRyqYqjjUrOU3Kjfk43qbchz7bd9BWKKsyG5WmMe5tI2rVXWk2TJwepTBEhmeGGGgkFYmJ0zay-JA2SD5lod1UD3rtIyv56GKKf3ySSyO1X3YqfBD_rrB8bLeocp5_z9YwtkNKS2TixPDC8NK7NKw67_zE8LLJ_r4OS_A_qEsML3uWyPCyx_kVAAD__5vd4Mc">