<html>
<head>
<base href="https://bugs.llvm.org/">
</head>
<body><span class="vcard"><a class="email" href="mailto:david.bolvansky@gmail.com" title="David Bolvansky <david.bolvansky@gmail.com>"> <span class="fn">David Bolvansky</span></a>
</span> changed
<a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_REOPENED "
title="REOPENED - New compile time regressions (12 vs 13) on znver3 (LoopMicroOpBufferSize too large?)"
href="https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=51460">bug 51460</a>
<br>
<table border="1" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="8">
<tr>
<th>What</th>
<th>Removed</th>
<th>Added</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="text-align:right;">Status</td>
<td>RESOLVED
</td>
<td>REOPENED
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="text-align:right;">Summary</td>
<td>New compile time regressions (12 vs 13)
</td>
<td>New compile time regressions (12 vs 13) on znver3 (LoopMicroOpBufferSize too large?)
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="text-align:right;">Resolution</td>
<td>DUPLICATE
</td>
<td>---
</td>
</tr></table>
<p>
<div>
<b><a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_REOPENED "
title="REOPENED - New compile time regressions (12 vs 13) on znver3 (LoopMicroOpBufferSize too large?)"
href="https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=51460#c5">Comment # 5</a>
on <a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_REOPENED "
title="REOPENED - New compile time regressions (12 vs 13) on znver3 (LoopMicroOpBufferSize too large?)"
href="https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=51460">bug 51460</a>
from <span class="vcard"><a class="email" href="mailto:david.bolvansky@gmail.com" title="David Bolvansky <david.bolvansky@gmail.com>"> <span class="fn">David Bolvansky</span></a>
</span></b>
<pre><span class="quote">> Shouldn't LoopMicroOpBufferSize for znver3 be reduced?</span >
Yeah, there should be a more reasonable value because as wee see for reported
projects, regressions are huge (and hardly with 30% better runtime perf to
“justify” them).
Reopened, renamed a bit.</pre>
</div>
</p>
<hr>
<span>You are receiving this mail because:</span>
<ul>
<li>You are on the CC list for the bug.</li>
</ul>
</body>
</html>