<html>
    <head>
      <base href="https://bugs.llvm.org/">
    </head>
    <body><table border="1" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="8">
        <tr>
          <th>Bug ID</th>
          <td><a class="bz_bug_link 
          bz_status_NEW "
   title="NEW - Forward declared literal type template arg error"
   href="https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=51070">51070</a>
          </td>
        </tr>

        <tr>
          <th>Summary</th>
          <td>Forward declared literal type template arg error
          </td>
        </tr>

        <tr>
          <th>Product</th>
          <td>clang
          </td>
        </tr>

        <tr>
          <th>Version</th>
          <td>trunk
          </td>
        </tr>

        <tr>
          <th>Hardware</th>
          <td>PC
          </td>
        </tr>

        <tr>
          <th>OS</th>
          <td>Linux
          </td>
        </tr>

        <tr>
          <th>Status</th>
          <td>NEW
          </td>
        </tr>

        <tr>
          <th>Severity</th>
          <td>enhancement
          </td>
        </tr>

        <tr>
          <th>Priority</th>
          <td>P
          </td>
        </tr>

        <tr>
          <th>Component</th>
          <td>C++2a
          </td>
        </tr>

        <tr>
          <th>Assignee</th>
          <td>unassignedclangbugs@nondot.org
          </td>
        </tr>

        <tr>
          <th>Reporter</th>
          <td>nathan@acm.org
          </td>
        </tr>

        <tr>
          <th>CC</th>
          <td>blitzrakete@gmail.com, erik.pilkington@gmail.com, llvm-bugs@lists.llvm.org, richard-llvm@metafoo.co.uk
          </td>
        </tr></table>
      <p>
        <div>
        <pre>Created <span class=""><a href="attachment.cgi?id=25018" name="attach_25018" title="testcase">attachment 25018</a> <a href="attachment.cgi?id=25018&action=edit" title="testcase">[details]</a></span>
testcase

Using a forward declared literal type in a forward declaration of a template
leads to (at best) a confusing error when the template is defined. Clang claims
the parameter has a different type in the two template declarations.  I've not
checked the std, but IMHO either the forward declaration 
  template<Literal key> struct S;
should be rejected as Literal is incomplete, or the later redeclaration of that
template is valid.  Note we don't instantiate S until Literal is defined.

(1)bester:14>bin/clang++ -std=c++20 -c a.cc -DNO_REDECL
bester:15>bin/clang++ -std=c++20 -c a.cc            
a.cc:5:18: error: non-type template parameter has incomplete type 'Literal'
template<Literal key> struct S;
                 ^
a.cc:2:8: note: forward declaration of 'Literal'
struct Literal;
       ^
a.cc:13:18: error: template non-type parameter has a different type 'Literal'
in template redeclaration
template<Literal key>
                 ^
a.cc:5:18: note: previous non-type template parameter with type 'int' is here
template<Literal key> struct S;
                 ^
a.cc:18:6: error: implicit instantiation of undefined template 'S<1>'
S<1> x ;
     ^
a.cc:5:30: note: template is declared here
template<Literal key> struct S;
                             ^</pre>
        </div>
      </p>


      <hr>
      <span>You are receiving this mail because:</span>

      <ul>
          <li>You are on the CC list for the bug.</li>
      </ul>
    </body>
</html>