<html>
    <head>
      <base href="https://bugs.llvm.org/">
    </head>
    <body><table border="1" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="8">
        <tr>
          <th>Bug ID</th>
          <td><a class="bz_bug_link 
          bz_status_NEW "
   title="NEW - [Coroutine] Coroutine collect unneeded variables to coroutine frame."
   href="https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=50372">50372</a>
          </td>
        </tr>

        <tr>
          <th>Summary</th>
          <td>[Coroutine] Coroutine collect unneeded variables to coroutine frame.
          </td>
        </tr>

        <tr>
          <th>Product</th>
          <td>clang
          </td>
        </tr>

        <tr>
          <th>Version</th>
          <td>trunk
          </td>
        </tr>

        <tr>
          <th>Hardware</th>
          <td>PC
          </td>
        </tr>

        <tr>
          <th>OS</th>
          <td>All
          </td>
        </tr>

        <tr>
          <th>Status</th>
          <td>NEW
          </td>
        </tr>

        <tr>
          <th>Severity</th>
          <td>normal
          </td>
        </tr>

        <tr>
          <th>Priority</th>
          <td>P
          </td>
        </tr>

        <tr>
          <th>Component</th>
          <td>C++2a
          </td>
        </tr>

        <tr>
          <th>Assignee</th>
          <td>unassignedclangbugs@nondot.org
          </td>
        </tr>

        <tr>
          <th>Reporter</th>
          <td>yedeng.yd@linux.alibaba.com
          </td>
        </tr>

        <tr>
          <th>CC</th>
          <td>blitzrakete@gmail.com, erik.pilkington@gmail.com, llvm-bugs@lists.llvm.org, richard-llvm@metafoo.co.uk
          </td>
        </tr></table>
      <p>
        <div>
        <pre>I am not sure if it is OK to mark this with a bug. It is like a feature more to
me. I mark this with bugzilla since I found this:
<a class="bz_bug_link 
          bz_status_RESOLVED  bz_closed"
   title="RESOLVED FIXED - [coroutines] coroutine frame layout doesn't reuse storage for local variables with non-overlapping lifetimes"
   href="show_bug.cgi?id=45566">https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=45566</a>, which tells an optimization
instead of a bug.

The motivation example comes from: <a href="https://godbolt.org/z/c4zx9fE88">https://godbolt.org/z/c4zx9fE88</a>.

The key codes is:
```
cppcoro::task<int> simple() noexcept {
    // 552 byte coroutine frame
    char dummy[500];
    for (int i = 0;i < 500; i++)
        dummy[i] = rand()%8;
    consume(dummy[rand()%500]);
    co_await std::experimental::suspend_always{};
    co_return 10;
}
```

Here we can find that the `dummy` isn't used across suspend point. So the dummy
could show as a stack variable. If compilers could optimize this, we could get
a smaller coroutine frame.</pre>
        </div>
      </p>


      <hr>
      <span>You are receiving this mail because:</span>

      <ul>
          <li>You are on the CC list for the bug.</li>
      </ul>
    </body>
</html>