<html>
    <head>
      <base href="https://bugs.llvm.org/">
    </head>
    <body><table border="1" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="8">
        <tr>
          <th>Bug ID</th>
          <td><a class="bz_bug_link 
          bz_status_NEW "
   title="NEW - Parameter packs and variadic arguments: Clang, gcc, and msvc differ on this one"
   href="https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=49852">49852</a>
          </td>
        </tr>

        <tr>
          <th>Summary</th>
          <td>Parameter packs and variadic arguments: Clang, gcc, and msvc differ on this one
          </td>
        </tr>

        <tr>
          <th>Product</th>
          <td>clang
          </td>
        </tr>

        <tr>
          <th>Version</th>
          <td>trunk
          </td>
        </tr>

        <tr>
          <th>Hardware</th>
          <td>PC
          </td>
        </tr>

        <tr>
          <th>OS</th>
          <td>Linux
          </td>
        </tr>

        <tr>
          <th>Status</th>
          <td>NEW
          </td>
        </tr>

        <tr>
          <th>Severity</th>
          <td>normal
          </td>
        </tr>

        <tr>
          <th>Priority</th>
          <td>P
          </td>
        </tr>

        <tr>
          <th>Component</th>
          <td>C++
          </td>
        </tr>

        <tr>
          <th>Assignee</th>
          <td>unassignedclangbugs@nondot.org
          </td>
        </tr>

        <tr>
          <th>Reporter</th>
          <td>matthurd@acm.org
          </td>
        </tr>

        <tr>
          <th>CC</th>
          <td>blitzrakete@gmail.com, dgregor@apple.com, erik.pilkington@gmail.com, llvm-bugs@lists.llvm.org, richard-llvm@metafoo.co.uk
          </td>
        </tr></table>
      <p>
        <div>
        <pre>Clang on trunk, 11, and 10 seems to get the "add_three" second example below
wrong. Clang 9 generates an error FWIW.
____________________

gcc, clang, and msvc all compile this fun one:

auto foo(auto......) { return 42; }
int add_three() { return foo<int,int>(3,4,5); }
____________________

But they argue about this curious one:

[[nodiscard]] constexpr auto foo(auto...t...) noexcept {return (... + t);}
int add_three() { return foo<int,int>(3,4,5);} //gcc(7),  clang(12), msvc(err)
int add_more()  { return foo(3,4,5,6);       } //gcc(18), clang(18), msvc(err)

<a href="https://godbolt.org/z/cEoYrn4T8">https://godbolt.org/z/cEoYrn4T8</a>
____________________

It feels to me like gcc is doing the right thing. Which two compilers have
bugs?

--Matt.</pre>
        </div>
      </p>


      <hr>
      <span>You are receiving this mail because:</span>

      <ul>
          <li>You are on the CC list for the bug.</li>
      </ul>
    </body>
</html>