<html>
    <head>
      <base href="https://bugs.llvm.org/">
    </head>
    <body><table border="1" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="8">
        <tr>
          <th>Bug ID</th>
          <td><a class="bz_bug_link 
          bz_status_NEW "
   title="NEW - improve diagnostic for "new func()""
   href="https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=48196">48196</a>
          </td>
        </tr>

        <tr>
          <th>Summary</th>
          <td>improve diagnostic for "new func()"
          </td>
        </tr>

        <tr>
          <th>Product</th>
          <td>clang
          </td>
        </tr>

        <tr>
          <th>Version</th>
          <td>unspecified
          </td>
        </tr>

        <tr>
          <th>Hardware</th>
          <td>PC
          </td>
        </tr>

        <tr>
          <th>OS</th>
          <td>Linux
          </td>
        </tr>

        <tr>
          <th>Status</th>
          <td>NEW
          </td>
        </tr>

        <tr>
          <th>Severity</th>
          <td>enhancement
          </td>
        </tr>

        <tr>
          <th>Priority</th>
          <td>P
          </td>
        </tr>

        <tr>
          <th>Component</th>
          <td>-New Bugs
          </td>
        </tr>

        <tr>
          <th>Assignee</th>
          <td>unassignedclangbugs@nondot.org
          </td>
        </tr>

        <tr>
          <th>Reporter</th>
          <td>nick@wasmer.io
          </td>
        </tr>

        <tr>
          <th>CC</th>
          <td>htmldeveloper@gmail.com, llvm-bugs@lists.llvm.org, neeilans@live.com, richard-llvm@metafoo.co.uk
          </td>
        </tr></table>
      <p>
        <div>
        <pre>Testcase:

class Foo {
  Foo() = default;
public:
  static Foo make();
};

Foo *test() {
  return new Foo::make();
}

Clang emits:

<source>:8:19: error: no type named 'make' in 'Foo'
  return new Foo::make();
             ~~~~~^
1 error generated.
Compiler returned: 1

Which was quite confusing at first. There is a 'make' in 'Foo'. Once I
confirmed that, I read the message again. Why does clang demand a type, it's
not like I said typename? What is going on. The error doesn't point at the real
bug, the extra 'new'.

In general when emitting a diagnostics with "there is no X named Y in Z" please
point out that there is a Y in Z that isn't an X. Also when possible please
point to the reason why we're expecting a type (in this case, the 'new'). In
this specific case, it would be magical if clang tried to typo-correct removing
'new' to see if the function call expression would parse and produce an
expression of the correct type.</pre>
        </div>
      </p>


      <hr>
      <span>You are receiving this mail because:</span>

      <ul>
          <li>You are on the CC list for the bug.</li>
      </ul>
    </body>
</html>