<html>
    <head>
      <base href="https://bugs.llvm.org/">
    </head>
    <body><span class="vcard"><a class="email" href="mailto:richard-llvm@metafoo.co.uk" title="Richard Smith <richard-llvm@metafoo.co.uk>"> <span class="fn">Richard Smith</span></a>
</span> changed
          <a class="bz_bug_link 
          bz_status_RESOLVED  bz_closed"
   title="RESOLVED INVALID - clang reports an error: no member a class defination"
   href="https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=47520">bug 47520</a>
          <br>
             <table border="1" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="8">
          <tr>
            <th>What</th>
            <th>Removed</th>
            <th>Added</th>
          </tr>

         <tr>
           <td style="text-align:right;">Status</td>
           <td>NEW
           </td>
           <td>RESOLVED
           </td>
         </tr>

         <tr>
           <td style="text-align:right;">Resolution</td>
           <td>---
           </td>
           <td>INVALID
           </td>
         </tr></table>
      <p>
        <div>
            <b><a class="bz_bug_link 
          bz_status_RESOLVED  bz_closed"
   title="RESOLVED INVALID - clang reports an error: no member a class defination"
   href="https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=47520#c1">Comment # 1</a>
              on <a class="bz_bug_link 
          bz_status_RESOLVED  bz_closed"
   title="RESOLVED INVALID - clang reports an error: no member a class defination"
   href="https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=47520">bug 47520</a>
              from <span class="vcard"><a class="email" href="mailto:richard-llvm@metafoo.co.uk" title="Richard Smith <richard-llvm@metafoo.co.uk>"> <span class="fn">Richard Smith</span></a>
</span></b>
        <pre>Clang is correct; this code is ill-formed. In the context of
C1<T1>::C2::C3::f(), C1<T1> is considered to be part of "the current
instantiation", because it can't be specialized without eliminating that
declaration of C1<T1>::C2::C3::f() as a member. Therefore the standard
specifies that lookup of E is done from the template definition context, and
because C1 has no dependent base classes, it needs to succeed in that context.

Now, GCC's behavior here is also conforming -- an implementation is more or
less never required to diagnose invalid template definitions if the template is
nevrer instantiated -- but the behavior of Clang and other compilers that
diagnose this eagerly (such as EDG) is generally considered preferable.</pre>
        </div>
      </p>


      <hr>
      <span>You are receiving this mail because:</span>

      <ul>
          <li>You are on the CC list for the bug.</li>
      </ul>
    </body>
</html>