<html>
    <head>
      <base href="https://bugs.llvm.org/">
    </head>
    <body><span class="vcard"><a class="email" href="mailto:richard-llvm@metafoo.co.uk" title="Richard Smith <richard-llvm@metafoo.co.uk>"> <span class="fn">Richard Smith</span></a>
</span> changed
          <a class="bz_bug_link 
          bz_status_RESOLVED  bz_closed"
   title="RESOLVED INVALID - Clang treats differently on function return type with a union"
   href="https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=46645">bug 46645</a>
          <br>
             <table border="1" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="8">
          <tr>
            <th>What</th>
            <th>Removed</th>
            <th>Added</th>
          </tr>

         <tr>
           <td style="text-align:right;">Resolution</td>
           <td>---
           </td>
           <td>INVALID
           </td>
         </tr>

         <tr>
           <td style="text-align:right;">Status</td>
           <td>NEW
           </td>
           <td>RESOLVED
           </td>
         </tr></table>
      <p>
        <div>
            <b><a class="bz_bug_link 
          bz_status_RESOLVED  bz_closed"
   title="RESOLVED INVALID - Clang treats differently on function return type with a union"
   href="https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=46645#c1">Comment # 1</a>
              on <a class="bz_bug_link 
          bz_status_RESOLVED  bz_closed"
   title="RESOLVED INVALID - Clang treats differently on function return type with a union"
   href="https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=46645">bug 46645</a>
              from <span class="vcard"><a class="email" href="mailto:richard-llvm@metafoo.co.uk" title="Richard Smith <richard-llvm@metafoo.co.uk>"> <span class="fn">Richard Smith</span></a>
</span></b>
        <pre><span class="quote">> This code, test.cc, line 1 and 2 equals to line 3 (right?).</span >

They're approximately the same, but not entirely the same. The C++ rules don't
permit a type definition to appear in a return type, so line 3 is invalid, as
Clang and GCC report.

<span class="quote">> So is this a Clang's accept-invalid bug or GCC's reject-valid?</span >

This is a GCC rejects-valid bug. There's nothing wrong with line 2, and GCC's
diagnostic says that "class" was used when naming the union, which is obviously
wrong -- the keyword "class" does not appear in your example at all.

Even weirder: GCC gives a different diagnostic if you replace 'typename' with
'class'!</pre>
        </div>
      </p>


      <hr>
      <span>You are receiving this mail because:</span>

      <ul>
          <li>You are on the CC list for the bug.</li>
      </ul>
    </body>
</html>