<html>
    <head>
      <base href="https://bugs.llvm.org/">
    </head>
    <body><table border="1" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="8">
        <tr>
          <th>Bug ID</th>
          <td><a class="bz_bug_link 
          bz_status_NEW "
   title="NEW - Fix redundant-move for CWG1579."
   href="https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=45254">45254</a>
          </td>
        </tr>

        <tr>
          <th>Summary</th>
          <td>Fix redundant-move for CWG1579.
          </td>
        </tr>

        <tr>
          <th>Product</th>
          <td>clang
          </td>
        </tr>

        <tr>
          <th>Version</th>
          <td>10.0
          </td>
        </tr>

        <tr>
          <th>Hardware</th>
          <td>All
          </td>
        </tr>

        <tr>
          <th>OS</th>
          <td>All
          </td>
        </tr>

        <tr>
          <th>Status</th>
          <td>NEW
          </td>
        </tr>

        <tr>
          <th>Severity</th>
          <td>enhancement
          </td>
        </tr>

        <tr>
          <th>Priority</th>
          <td>P
          </td>
        </tr>

        <tr>
          <th>Component</th>
          <td>C++14
          </td>
        </tr>

        <tr>
          <th>Assignee</th>
          <td>unassignedclangbugs@nondot.org
          </td>
        </tr>

        <tr>
          <th>Reporter</th>
          <td>bungeman@gmail.com
          </td>
        </tr>

        <tr>
          <th>CC</th>
          <td>blitzrakete@gmail.com, erik.pilkington@gmail.com, llvm-bugs@lists.llvm.org, richard-llvm@metafoo.co.uk
          </td>
        </tr></table>
      <p>
        <div>
        <pre>In "D11615 Fix redundant move warning" the redundant-move diagnostic was
limited due to clang at the time not implementing CWG1579. Later with "D21619
[Sema] Implement C++14's DR1579: Prefer moving id-expression out of functions"
this was implemented, but the redundant-move diagnostic was not updated. In the
meantime gcc has implemented a redundant-move diagnostic which does support
CWG1579, so the diagnostics are confusingly different without need. Clang's
current redundant-move diagnostic would be better named
redundant-move-in-c++11.

This is somewhat complicated by the introduction in "D43322 Diagnose cases of
"return x" that should be "return std::move(x)" for efficiency" of
return-std-move-in-c++11 which is helpful if older toolchains need to be
supported. It would be nice if the redundant-move diagnostic were split into
redundant-move-in-c++11 and redundant-move since return-std-move-in-c++11 and a
full CWG1579 redundant-move are in conflict (by definition).</pre>
        </div>
      </p>


      <hr>
      <span>You are receiving this mail because:</span>

      <ul>
          <li>You are on the CC list for the bug.</li>
      </ul>
    </body>
</html>