<html>
    <head>
      <base href="https://bugs.llvm.org/">
    </head>
    <body><span class="vcard"><a class="email" href="mailto:stephen.tozer@sony.com" title="Stephen Tozer <stephen.tozer@sony.com>"> <span class="fn">Stephen Tozer</span></a>
</span> changed
          <a class="bz_bug_link 
          bz_status_REOPENED "
   title="REOPENED - [DebugInfo@O2][Dexter] Misleading value for local variable at the return statement."
   href="https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=39339">bug 39339</a>
          <br>
             <table border="1" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="8">
          <tr>
            <th>What</th>
            <th>Removed</th>
            <th>Added</th>
          </tr>

         <tr>
           <td style="text-align:right;">Resolution</td>
           <td>FIXED
           </td>
           <td>---
           </td>
         </tr>

         <tr>
           <td style="text-align:right;">Status</td>
           <td>RESOLVED
           </td>
           <td>REOPENED
           </td>
         </tr></table>
      <p>
        <div>
            <b><a class="bz_bug_link 
          bz_status_REOPENED "
   title="REOPENED - [DebugInfo@O2][Dexter] Misleading value for local variable at the return statement."
   href="https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=39339#c11">Comment # 11</a>
              on <a class="bz_bug_link 
          bz_status_REOPENED "
   title="REOPENED - [DebugInfo@O2][Dexter] Misleading value for local variable at the return statement."
   href="https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=39339">bug 39339</a>
              from <span class="vcard"><a class="email" href="mailto:stephen.tozer@sony.com" title="Stephen Tozer <stephen.tozer@sony.com>"> <span class="fn">Stephen Tozer</span></a>
</span></b>
        <pre>A fix has been completed for this issue (see the above comment), but it has
twice now been reverted after being merged in due to causing timeouts and build
failures, which apparently result from a massive increase in the number of
debug intrinsics remaining, described and addressed for one case in[0]. It
seems as though it's going to be difficult to implement this change in a way
that doesn't result in an excessive number of undef intrinsics being left in
the program in order to defend against values falling out of date. There may
need to be some broader changes made to how we handle intrinsics (especially
undef values) before we can fix this issue permanently.

[0] <a href="https://reviews.llvm.org/D73054">https://reviews.llvm.org/D73054</a></pre>
        </div>
      </p>


      <hr>
      <span>You are receiving this mail because:</span>

      <ul>
          <li>You are on the CC list for the bug.</li>
      </ul>
    </body>
</html>