<html>
    <head>
      <base href="https://bugs.llvm.org/">
    </head>
    <body><span class="vcard"><a class="email" href="mailto:zegzmanzoro@gmail.com" title="Martynas Skirmantas <zegzmanzoro@gmail.com>"> <span class="fn">Martynas Skirmantas</span></a>
</span> changed
          <a class="bz_bug_link 
          bz_status_RESOLVED  bz_closed"
   title="RESOLVED WONTFIX - [CLANG-CL] 64x inline assembler function call/jump miscompiled"
   href="https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=44272">bug 44272</a>
          <br>
             <table border="1" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="8">
          <tr>
            <th>What</th>
            <th>Removed</th>
            <th>Added</th>
          </tr>

         <tr>
           <td style="text-align:right;">Resolution</td>
           <td>---
           </td>
           <td>WONTFIX
           </td>
         </tr>

         <tr>
           <td style="text-align:right;">Status</td>
           <td>NEW
           </td>
           <td>RESOLVED
           </td>
         </tr></table>
      <p>
        <div>
            <b><a class="bz_bug_link 
          bz_status_RESOLVED  bz_closed"
   title="RESOLVED WONTFIX - [CLANG-CL] 64x inline assembler function call/jump miscompiled"
   href="https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=44272#c4">Comment # 4</a>
              on <a class="bz_bug_link 
          bz_status_RESOLVED  bz_closed"
   title="RESOLVED WONTFIX - [CLANG-CL] 64x inline assembler function call/jump miscompiled"
   href="https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=44272">bug 44272</a>
              from <span class="vcard"><a class="email" href="mailto:zegzmanzoro@gmail.com" title="Martynas Skirmantas <zegzmanzoro@gmail.com>"> <span class="fn">Martynas Skirmantas</span></a>
</span></b>
        <pre>Yeah, understood, doesn't look like this will go anywhere but would be great, I
wouldn't say that its banned, there were recent posts of Microsoft claiming
they are looking into it but there's still no response from them regarding
that, intrinsics don't really cut it when you need absolute control without the
function call overhead or some other reason? truly a bummer for someone that
works with the system internals all the time.

GCC/G++ (GNU) supports 64bit inline assembly which I have used in the past but
moved on due the need to use windows libraries which has many problems when
attempted to use with GNU. I've even managed to make a couple of kernel drivers
with it, but that is not a option for someone that of focusing on only windows
and needs to use very uncommon libraries.

Well, thank you for taking the time at taking a look at the problem, I thought
it may be worth reporting regardless so it wouldn't go unnoticed.</pre>
        </div>
      </p>


      <hr>
      <span>You are receiving this mail because:</span>

      <ul>
          <li>You are on the CC list for the bug.</li>
      </ul>
    </body>
</html>