<html>
    <head>
      <base href="https://bugs.llvm.org/">
    </head>
    <body><table border="1" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="8">
        <tr>
          <th>Bug ID</th>
          <td><a class="bz_bug_link 
          bz_status_NEW "
   title="NEW - Degraded performance after closing and opening a filebuf"
   href="https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=44194">44194</a>
          </td>
        </tr>

        <tr>
          <th>Summary</th>
          <td>Degraded performance after closing and opening a filebuf
          </td>
        </tr>

        <tr>
          <th>Product</th>
          <td>libc++
          </td>
        </tr>

        <tr>
          <th>Version</th>
          <td>9.0
          </td>
        </tr>

        <tr>
          <th>Hardware</th>
          <td>All
          </td>
        </tr>

        <tr>
          <th>OS</th>
          <td>All
          </td>
        </tr>

        <tr>
          <th>Status</th>
          <td>NEW
          </td>
        </tr>

        <tr>
          <th>Severity</th>
          <td>enhancement
          </td>
        </tr>

        <tr>
          <th>Priority</th>
          <td>P
          </td>
        </tr>

        <tr>
          <th>Component</th>
          <td>All Bugs
          </td>
        </tr>

        <tr>
          <th>Assignee</th>
          <td>unassignedclangbugs@nondot.org
          </td>
        </tr>

        <tr>
          <th>Reporter</th>
          <td>alex@grundis.de
          </td>
        </tr>

        <tr>
          <th>CC</th>
          <td>llvm-bugs@lists.llvm.org, mclow.lists@gmail.com
          </td>
        </tr></table>
      <p>
        <div>
        <pre>When creating a `std::filebuf` an internal buffer of size 4kB is allocated and
used for reading/writing. On calling `close` on that filebuf that buffer is
deallocated falling back to a small internal buffer (8B IIRC). This is then
used for reading/writing when opening a new file with `std::filebuf::open`.

This small buffer leads to way worse performance than the original 4kB buffer.
I'm considering this a bug, as at least the users expectation would be to that
close and reopen a filebuf would be cheaper than recreating the whole instance.
This matters e.g. when using the filebuf in a loop.

Note: As filebuf is used by [io]fstream, the argument does apply to all
standard fstreams.</pre>
        </div>
      </p>


      <hr>
      <span>You are receiving this mail because:</span>

      <ul>
          <li>You are on the CC list for the bug.</li>
      </ul>
    </body>
</html>