<html>
    <head>
      <base href="https://bugs.llvm.org/">
    </head>
    <body><span class="vcard"><a class="email" href="mailto:richard-llvm@metafoo.co.uk" title="Richard Smith <richard-llvm@metafoo.co.uk>"> <span class="fn">Richard Smith</span></a>
</span> changed
          <a class="bz_bug_link 
          bz_status_RESOLVED  bz_closed"
   title="RESOLVED INVALID - Missing -Wuninitialized warning with some gotos"
   href="https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=43717">bug 43717</a>
          <br>
             <table border="1" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="8">
          <tr>
            <th>What</th>
            <th>Removed</th>
            <th>Added</th>
          </tr>

         <tr>
           <td style="text-align:right;">Status</td>
           <td>NEW
           </td>
           <td>RESOLVED
           </td>
         </tr>

         <tr>
           <td style="text-align:right;">Resolution</td>
           <td>---
           </td>
           <td>INVALID
           </td>
         </tr></table>
      <p>
        <div>
            <b><a class="bz_bug_link 
          bz_status_RESOLVED  bz_closed"
   title="RESOLVED INVALID - Missing -Wuninitialized warning with some gotos"
   href="https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=43717#c1">Comment # 1</a>
              on <a class="bz_bug_link 
          bz_status_RESOLVED  bz_closed"
   title="RESOLVED INVALID - Missing -Wuninitialized warning with some gotos"
   href="https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=43717">bug 43717</a>
              from <span class="vcard"><a class="email" href="mailto:richard-llvm@metafoo.co.uk" title="Richard Smith <richard-llvm@metafoo.co.uk>"> <span class="fn">Richard Smith</span></a>
</span></b>
        <pre>This is working as intended.

-Wuninitialized warns on cases where a particular use of a variable is only
reachable in cases where the variable is uninitialized. (So either that use of
the variable is unreachable, or you have a use-uninitialized bug.)

-Wsometimes-uninitialized warns on cases where a particular branch always
results in an uninitialized use whenever it's taken. (So either that branch can
never be taken in that direction, or you have a use-uninitialized bug.)

Under the assumption that you have no dead code, both warnings have zero false
positives.


If instead you want a warning with fewer false negatives (but that instead has
false positives), you can use -Wconditional-uninitialized. That will warn
whenever we see a use of a variable and we can find any path to that variable
that didn't initialize it. (This has false positives if the path that we find
is actually impossible -- for instance, if it contains two branches on the same
value and requires them to go in different directions.)

-Wconditional-uninitialized does warn on this code:

<stdin>:20:16: warning: variable 'status' may be uninitialized when used here
[-Wconditional-uninitialized]
        return status;
               ^~~~~~
<stdin>:4:19: note: initialize the variable 'status' to silence this warning
        int status;
                  ^
                   = 0

(You can also use -Weverything to find out whether clang has a warning for a
particular construct.)</pre>
        </div>
      </p>


      <hr>
      <span>You are receiving this mail because:</span>

      <ul>
          <li>You are on the CC list for the bug.</li>
      </ul>
    </body>
</html>