<html>
    <head>
      <base href="https://bugs.llvm.org/">
    </head>
    <body><table border="1" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="8">
        <tr>
          <th>Bug ID</th>
          <td><a class="bz_bug_link 
          bz_status_NEW "
   title="NEW - Improve diagnostics for trying to invoke a destructor on a qualified namespace"
   href="https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=43494">43494</a>
          </td>
        </tr>

        <tr>
          <th>Summary</th>
          <td>Improve diagnostics for trying to invoke a destructor on a qualified namespace
          </td>
        </tr>

        <tr>
          <th>Product</th>
          <td>clang
          </td>
        </tr>

        <tr>
          <th>Version</th>
          <td>trunk
          </td>
        </tr>

        <tr>
          <th>Hardware</th>
          <td>All
          </td>
        </tr>

        <tr>
          <th>OS</th>
          <td>All
          </td>
        </tr>

        <tr>
          <th>Status</th>
          <td>NEW
          </td>
        </tr>

        <tr>
          <th>Severity</th>
          <td>enhancement
          </td>
        </tr>

        <tr>
          <th>Priority</th>
          <td>P
          </td>
        </tr>

        <tr>
          <th>Component</th>
          <td>C++
          </td>
        </tr>

        <tr>
          <th>Assignee</th>
          <td>unassignedclangbugs@nondot.org
          </td>
        </tr>

        <tr>
          <th>Reporter</th>
          <td>arcata@gmail.com
          </td>
        </tr>

        <tr>
          <th>CC</th>
          <td>blitzrakete@gmail.com, dgregor@apple.com, erik.pilkington@gmail.com, llvm-bugs@lists.llvm.org, richard-llvm@metafoo.co.uk
          </td>
        </tr></table>
      <p>
        <div>
        <pre>If you try to invoke the destructor on a `std::string`, and you don't already
know the answer for what you're supposed to write, then the diagnostics are not
helpful at best, and misleading at worst:

% cat ~/foo.cpp          
#include <string>
void destroyString(std::string &&s) {
  s.~string();
}

% xcrun clang++ ~/foo.cpp
/Users/jgroff/foo.cpp:3:6: error: identifier 'string' in object destruction
expression does not name
      a type
  s.~string();
     ^


% cat ~/foo1.cpp
#include <string>
void destroyString(std::string &&s) {
  s.~std::string();
}

% clang++ ~/foo1.cpp
/Users/jgroff/foo1.cpp:3:5: error: '~' in destructor name should be after
nested name specifier
  s.~std::string();
    ^
          ~
/Users/jgroff/foo.cpp:3:5: error: qualified member access refers to a member in
namespace 'std'
  s.~std::string();
    ^~~~~~

% cat ~/foo2.cpp          
#include <string>
void destroyString(std::string &&s) {
  s.std::~string();
}

% clang++ ~/foo2.cpp
/Users/jgroff/foo2.cpp:3:10: error: qualified member access refers to a member
in namespace 'std'
  s.std::~string();
    ~~~~~^


% cat ~/foo3.cpp          
#include <string>
void destroyString(std::string &&s) {
  s.std::string::~string();
}

% clang++ ~/foo3.cpp
/Users/jgroff/foo3.cpp:3:19: error: expected the class name after '~' to name a
destructor
  s.std::string::~string();
                  ^


Any of these diagnostics seem like they could offer a fixit directly to the
correct syntax for what the user is trying to write, `s.~basic_string()`.</pre>
        </div>
      </p>


      <hr>
      <span>You are receiving this mail because:</span>

      <ul>
          <li>You are on the CC list for the bug.</li>
      </ul>
    </body>
</html>