<html>
    <head>
      <base href="https://bugs.llvm.org/">
    </head>
    <body><table border="1" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="8">
        <tr>
          <th>Bug ID</th>
          <td><a class="bz_bug_link 
          bz_status_NEW "
   title="NEW - -Wmissing-braces firing for aggregate structs with only 1 base and no members"
   href="https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=43232">43232</a>
          </td>
        </tr>

        <tr>
          <th>Summary</th>
          <td>-Wmissing-braces firing for aggregate structs with only 1 base and no members
          </td>
        </tr>

        <tr>
          <th>Product</th>
          <td>clang
          </td>
        </tr>

        <tr>
          <th>Version</th>
          <td>trunk
          </td>
        </tr>

        <tr>
          <th>Hardware</th>
          <td>All
          </td>
        </tr>

        <tr>
          <th>OS</th>
          <td>All
          </td>
        </tr>

        <tr>
          <th>Status</th>
          <td>NEW
          </td>
        </tr>

        <tr>
          <th>Severity</th>
          <td>enhancement
          </td>
        </tr>

        <tr>
          <th>Priority</th>
          <td>P
          </td>
        </tr>

        <tr>
          <th>Component</th>
          <td>C++17
          </td>
        </tr>

        <tr>
          <th>Assignee</th>
          <td>unassignedclangbugs@nondot.org
          </td>
        </tr>

        <tr>
          <th>Reporter</th>
          <td>wyverald@gmail.com
          </td>
        </tr>

        <tr>
          <th>CC</th>
          <td>blitzrakete@gmail.com, erik.pilkington@gmail.com, llvm-bugs@lists.llvm.org, richard-llvm@metafoo.co.uk
          </td>
        </tr></table>
      <p>
        <div>
        <pre>==============================
struct Base { int i, j; };
struct Derived : public Base {};
int test() { return Derived{3, 4}.i; }
==============================

The code above fires a -Wmissing-braces warning. This is rather annoying since
the suggested alternative `Derived{{3, 4}}` isn't much better.

This is related to the old bug <a class="bz_bug_link 
          bz_status_RESOLVED  bz_closed"
   title="RESOLVED FIXED - Warning "missing braces around initializer" causing problems with std::array"
   href="show_bug.cgi?id=21629">https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=21629</a>
which was resolved by r314838, which specifically whitelisted the following
case:

============================
struct Inner { int i, j; };
struct Outer { Inner inner; };
int test() { return Outer{3, 4}.i; }
============================

r314838 specifically mentions in a FIXME: "Should aggregate initialization of a
struct with a single base class and no members also suppress the warning?" I
think the answer should be yes.</pre>
        </div>
      </p>


      <hr>
      <span>You are receiving this mail because:</span>

      <ul>
          <li>You are on the CC list for the bug.</li>
      </ul>
    </body>
</html>