<html>
    <head>
      <base href="https://bugs.llvm.org/">
    </head>
    <body><table border="1" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="8">
        <tr>
          <th>Bug ID</th>
          <td><a class="bz_bug_link 
          bz_status_NEW "
   title="NEW - clang-format broken after lambda with return type template with boolean literal"
   href="https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=40910">40910</a>
          </td>
        </tr>

        <tr>
          <th>Summary</th>
          <td>clang-format broken after lambda with return type template with boolean literal
          </td>
        </tr>

        <tr>
          <th>Product</th>
          <td>clang
          </td>
        </tr>

        <tr>
          <th>Version</th>
          <td>8.0
          </td>
        </tr>

        <tr>
          <th>Hardware</th>
          <td>PC
          </td>
        </tr>

        <tr>
          <th>OS</th>
          <td>Linux
          </td>
        </tr>

        <tr>
          <th>Status</th>
          <td>NEW
          </td>
        </tr>

        <tr>
          <th>Severity</th>
          <td>enhancement
          </td>
        </tr>

        <tr>
          <th>Priority</th>
          <td>P
          </td>
        </tr>

        <tr>
          <th>Component</th>
          <td>Formatter
          </td>
        </tr>

        <tr>
          <th>Assignee</th>
          <td>unassignedclangbugs@nondot.org
          </td>
        </tr>

        <tr>
          <th>Reporter</th>
          <td>nikolaus@nikolaus-demmel.de
          </td>
        </tr>

        <tr>
          <th>CC</th>
          <td>djasper@google.com, klimek@google.com, llvm-bugs@lists.llvm.org
          </td>
        </tr></table>
      <p>
        <div>
        <pre>Clang format breaks on lambdas with return types that have literal booleans in
template arguments, e.g. 

    []() -> foo<true> { ; }();

The same works fine e.g. with integer literals. I tried version 7, 8, and
current version 9 from the Ubuntu Xenial apt repo and the behaviour is the same
everywhere. I narrowed it down to the following small test case:


template <bool>
using foo = void;
// works:
[]() -> foo<1> { ; }();
// broken:
[]() -> foo<true> { ; }();

namespace bar {
// broken:
auto foo{[]() -> foo<false> { ; }};
}  // namespace bar


I would expect clang-format (without additional options) to not change anything
here (which is the case if I replace 'true' / 'false' with e.g. '1', but the
actual result is as follows, which is particularly problematic in the presence
of namespaces as you can see:


template <bool>
using foo = void;
// works:
[]() -> foo<1> { ; }();
// broken:
[]() -> foo<true> { ; }
();

namespace bar {
// broken:
auto foo{[]() -> foo<false>{;
}  // namespace bar
}
;
}  // namespace bar</pre>
        </div>
      </p>


      <hr>
      <span>You are receiving this mail because:</span>

      <ul>
          <li>You are on the CC list for the bug.</li>
      </ul>
    </body>
</html>