<html>
    <head>
      <base href="https://bugs.llvm.org/">
    </head>
    <body><table border="1" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="8">
        <tr>
          <th>Bug ID</th>
          <td><a class="bz_bug_link 
          bz_status_NEW "
   title="NEW - Clang does not use the unqualified version of return type for C11 program."
   href="https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=40147">40147</a>
          </td>
        </tr>

        <tr>
          <th>Summary</th>
          <td>Clang does not use the unqualified version of return type for C11 program.
          </td>
        </tr>

        <tr>
          <th>Product</th>
          <td>clang
          </td>
        </tr>

        <tr>
          <th>Version</th>
          <td>trunk
          </td>
        </tr>

        <tr>
          <th>Hardware</th>
          <td>All
          </td>
        </tr>

        <tr>
          <th>OS</th>
          <td>All
          </td>
        </tr>

        <tr>
          <th>Status</th>
          <td>NEW
          </td>
        </tr>

        <tr>
          <th>Severity</th>
          <td>normal
          </td>
        </tr>

        <tr>
          <th>Priority</th>
          <td>P
          </td>
        </tr>

        <tr>
          <th>Component</th>
          <td>-New Bugs
          </td>
        </tr>

        <tr>
          <th>Assignee</th>
          <td>unassignedclangbugs@nondot.org
          </td>
        </tr>

        <tr>
          <th>Reporter</th>
          <td>anders.granlund.0@gmail.com
          </td>
        </tr>

        <tr>
          <th>CC</th>
          <td>htmldeveloper@gmail.com, llvm-bugs@lists.llvm.org, neeilans@live.com, richard-llvm@metafoo.co.uk
          </td>
        </tr></table>
      <p>
        <div>
        <pre>Test case (prog.c):

  int main()
  {
    typedef const int t();
    typedef int t();
  }

Compilation command line:

  clang prog.c -Wall -Wextra -std=c11 -pedantic-errors 

Observed behaviour:

  The following error message was outputed:

    error: typedef redefinition with different types ('int ()' vs
           'const int ()') typedef int t();

Expected behaviour:

  No error message. Both typedefs should define t to be of type 'int ()' since
  function types never have qualified return types.

Standard references:

  6.7.6.3.5

Note:

  gcc does not give any errors for the program.</pre>
        </div>
      </p>


      <hr>
      <span>You are receiving this mail because:</span>

      <ul>
          <li>You are on the CC list for the bug.</li>
      </ul>
    </body>
</html>