<html>
    <head>
      <base href="https://bugs.llvm.org/">
    </head>
    <body><span class="vcard"><a class="email" href="mailto:t.p.northover@gmail.com" title="Tim Northover <t.p.northover@gmail.com>"> <span class="fn">Tim Northover</span></a>
</span> changed
          <a class="bz_bug_link 
          bz_status_RESOLVED  bz_closed"
   title="RESOLVED FIXED - -fast-isel=0 for armv7 can result in 4-byte Reload without corresponding 4-byte Spill"
   href="https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=39714">bug 39714</a>
          <br>
             <table border="1" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="8">
          <tr>
            <th>What</th>
            <th>Removed</th>
            <th>Added</th>
          </tr>

         <tr>
           <td style="text-align:right;">Resolution</td>
           <td>---
           </td>
           <td>FIXED
           </td>
         </tr>

         <tr>
           <td style="text-align:right;">CC</td>
           <td>
                
           </td>
           <td>t.p.northover@gmail.com
           </td>
         </tr>

         <tr>
           <td style="text-align:right;">Status</td>
           <td>NEW
           </td>
           <td>RESOLVED
           </td>
         </tr></table>
      <p>
        <div>
            <b><a class="bz_bug_link 
          bz_status_RESOLVED  bz_closed"
   title="RESOLVED FIXED - -fast-isel=0 for armv7 can result in 4-byte Reload without corresponding 4-byte Spill"
   href="https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=39714#c1">Comment # 1</a>
              on <a class="bz_bug_link 
          bz_status_RESOLVED  bz_closed"
   title="RESOLVED FIXED - -fast-isel=0 for armv7 can result in 4-byte Reload without corresponding 4-byte Spill"
   href="https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=39714">bug 39714</a>
              from <span class="vcard"><a class="email" href="mailto:t.p.northover@gmail.com" title="Tim Northover <t.p.northover@gmail.com>"> <span class="fn">Tim Northover</span></a>
</span></b>
        <pre>It's another ARMFrameLowering.cpp bug. There is an earlier store that LLVM
thinks is going to the same slot, but it's miscalculating the offset from r6 in
the load because it thinks the neighbouring "sub sp, sp, ..." affects it.

Should be fixed in r348591.</pre>
        </div>
      </p>


      <hr>
      <span>You are receiving this mail because:</span>

      <ul>
          <li>You are on the CC list for the bug.</li>
      </ul>
    </body>
</html>