<html>
<head>
<base href="https://bugs.llvm.org/">
</head>
<body><table border="1" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="8">
<tr>
<th>Bug ID</th>
<td><a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_NEW "
title="NEW - New assertion failure `MustInsert.second && "New discriminator shouldn't be present in set"' (X86DiscriminateMemOps.cpp)"
href="https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=39890">39890</a>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th>Summary</th>
<td>New assertion failure `MustInsert.second && "New discriminator shouldn't be present in set"' (X86DiscriminateMemOps.cpp)
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th>Product</th>
<td>new-bugs
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th>Version</th>
<td>trunk
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th>Hardware</th>
<td>PC
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th>OS</th>
<td>Windows NT
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th>Status</th>
<td>NEW
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th>Severity</th>
<td>normal
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th>Priority</th>
<td>P
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th>Component</th>
<td>new bugs
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th>Assignee</th>
<td>unassignedbugs@nondot.org
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th>Reporter</th>
<td>greg.bedwell@sony.com
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th>CC</th>
<td>davidxl@google.com, htmldeveloper@gmail.com, llvm-bugs@lists.llvm.org, wmi@google.com
</td>
</tr></table>
<p>
<div>
<pre>Bisected on our internal fork to r347938 (Revert "Revert r347596 "Support for
inserting profile-directed cache prefetches") but reproducible with upstream
TOT (r348340) as follows:
$ cat 1.cpp
# define B4 b; b; b; b
# define B16 B4; B4; B4; B4
# define B64 B16; B16; B16; B16
# define B256 B64; B64; B64; B64
# define B1024 B256; B256; B256; B256
void a() {
volatile int b;
B1024; B1024; B;
}
$ ./bin/clang 1.cpp -c --target=x86_64-unknown-unknown -g
-fdebug-info-for-profiling -DB=
$ ./bin/clang 1.cpp -c --target=x86_64-unknown-unknown -g
-fdebug-info-for-profiling -DB=b
clang-8:
/mnt/e/work/public-git/llvm-project/llvm/lib/Target/X86/X86DiscriminateMemOps.cpp:119:
virtual bool
{anonymous}::X86DiscriminateMemOps::runOnMachineFunction(llvm::MachineFunction&):
Assertion `MustInsert.second && "New discriminator shouldn't be present in
set"' failed.
Obviously the above is quite a contrived testcase but we've seen it happen in
real code where there is heavy use of nested macro expansions.</pre>
</div>
</p>
<hr>
<span>You are receiving this mail because:</span>
<ul>
<li>You are on the CC list for the bug.</li>
</ul>
</body>
</html>