<html>
    <head>
      <base href="https://bugs.llvm.org/">
    </head>
    <body><table border="1" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="8">
        <tr>
          <th>Bug ID</th>
          <td><a class="bz_bug_link 
          bz_status_NEW "
   title="NEW - operator& definition causes unexplained error passing pointer-to-member to template parameter"
   href="https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=38257">38257</a>
          </td>
        </tr>

        <tr>
          <th>Summary</th>
          <td>operator& definition causes unexplained error passing pointer-to-member to template parameter
          </td>
        </tr>

        <tr>
          <th>Product</th>
          <td>clang
          </td>
        </tr>

        <tr>
          <th>Version</th>
          <td>6.0
          </td>
        </tr>

        <tr>
          <th>Hardware</th>
          <td>All
          </td>
        </tr>

        <tr>
          <th>OS</th>
          <td>Linux
          </td>
        </tr>

        <tr>
          <th>Status</th>
          <td>NEW
          </td>
        </tr>

        <tr>
          <th>Severity</th>
          <td>normal
          </td>
        </tr>

        <tr>
          <th>Priority</th>
          <td>P
          </td>
        </tr>

        <tr>
          <th>Component</th>
          <td>C++
          </td>
        </tr>

        <tr>
          <th>Assignee</th>
          <td>unassignedclangbugs@nondot.org
          </td>
        </tr>

        <tr>
          <th>Reporter</th>
          <td>ambrop7@gmail.com
          </td>
        </tr>

        <tr>
          <th>CC</th>
          <td>dgregor@apple.com, llvm-bugs@lists.llvm.org
          </td>
        </tr></table>
      <p>
        <div>
        <pre>The following C++14 program does not compile even though I think it should and
does with GCC.


template<typename>
class enable;

template<typename T, typename = typename enable<T>::enabled>
void operator&(T, T);

template<typename A, typename B, B A::*>
struct Member {};

template<typename>
struct Dummy {};

template<typename X>
struct Bar {
  struct Y {
    X field;
  };
  using Useless = Member<Y, X, &Y::field>;
};

template<typename>
struct Foo {
  struct Nested;
  using FieldType = Bar<Dummy<Nested>>;
  FieldType foo_member;
};

template<typename T>
struct Foo<T>::Nested : Member<Foo, FieldType, &Foo::foo_member> {};

Foo<void> foo;


The error is:

prog.cpp:29:54: error: no member 'foo_member' in 'Foo<void>'; it has not yet
been instantiated
struct Foo<T>::Nested : Member<Foo, FieldType, &Foo::foo_member> {};
                                                     ^
prog.cpp:18:32: note: in instantiation of member class 'Foo<void>::Nested'
requested here
  using Useless = Member<Y, X, &Y::field>;
                               ^
prog.cpp:25:13: note: in instantiation of template class
'Bar<Dummy<Foo<void>::Nested> >' requested here
  FieldType foo_member;
            ^
prog.cpp:31:11: note: in instantiation of template class 'Foo<void>' requested
here
Foo<void> foo;
          ^
prog.cpp:25:13: note: not-yet-instantiated member is declared here
  FieldType foo_member;
            ^


The following changes allow the program to compile:
- Removing the operator& definition or changing it to operator|. (This seems
very strange to me!)
- Removing the definition of Foo<T>::Nested (while leaving the declaration
within Foo).
- Removing "using Useless = ..." within Bar.

The error indicates that Clang is trying to instantiate Foo<void>::Nested due
to the expression &Y::field. This seems unnecessary to me. I think Dummy<X>
should be instantiatable for any X without needing to instantiate X, and as
such it seems inappropriate that Clang is instantiating Foo<void>::Nested.</pre>
        </div>
      </p>


      <hr>
      <span>You are receiving this mail because:</span>

      <ul>
          <li>You are on the CC list for the bug.</li>
      </ul>
    </body>
</html>