<html>
<head>
<base href="https://bugs.llvm.org/">
</head>
<body><table border="1" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="8">
<tr>
<th>Bug ID</th>
<td><a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_NEW "
title="NEW - Explicit array initialization in an initializer list"
href="https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=38043">38043</a>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th>Summary</th>
<td>Explicit array initialization in an initializer list
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th>Product</th>
<td>clang
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th>Version</th>
<td>unspecified
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th>Hardware</th>
<td>PC
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th>OS</th>
<td>Windows NT
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th>Status</th>
<td>NEW
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th>Severity</th>
<td>enhancement
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th>Priority</th>
<td>P
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th>Component</th>
<td>C++
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th>Assignee</th>
<td>unassignedclangbugs@nondot.org
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th>Reporter</th>
<td>zahira.ammarguellat@intel.com
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th>CC</th>
<td>dgregor@apple.com, llvm-bugs@lists.llvm.org
</td>
</tr></table>
<p>
<div>
<pre>Let's consider this test case:
#include <stdio.h>
struct foo {
int i;
foo() : i(23) {}
};
struct goo {
goo() {}
goo(const goo & other);
foo _lala[2];
};
goo::goo(const goo & other)
: _lala(other._lala)
{
}
int main()
{
goo z;
if (z._lala[0].i == 23)
puts("passed");
else
puts("failed");
return 0;
}
GCC compiles this.
CL and CLANG both generate an error.
Clang's error message is:
error: array initializer must be an initializer list
If the community doesn't want to follow GCC and allow array initialization via
an initializer list (violation of C++), then clang should at least return the
right error message as this is misleading?</pre>
</div>
</p>
<hr>
<span>You are receiving this mail because:</span>
<ul>
<li>You are on the CC list for the bug.</li>
</ul>
</body>
</html>