<html>
    <head>
      <base href="https://bugs.llvm.org/">
    </head>
    <body><table border="1" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="8">
        <tr>
          <th>Bug ID</th>
          <td><a class="bz_bug_link 
          bz_status_NEW "
   title="NEW - Handling doacross loops: dependencies"
   href="https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=37582">37582</a>
          </td>
        </tr>

        <tr>
          <th>Summary</th>
          <td>Handling doacross loops: dependencies
          </td>
        </tr>

        <tr>
          <th>Product</th>
          <td>OpenMP
          </td>
        </tr>

        <tr>
          <th>Version</th>
          <td>unspecified
          </td>
        </tr>

        <tr>
          <th>Hardware</th>
          <td>PC
          </td>
        </tr>

        <tr>
          <th>OS</th>
          <td>Linux
          </td>
        </tr>

        <tr>
          <th>Status</th>
          <td>NEW
          </td>
        </tr>

        <tr>
          <th>Severity</th>
          <td>enhancement
          </td>
        </tr>

        <tr>
          <th>Priority</th>
          <td>P
          </td>
        </tr>

        <tr>
          <th>Component</th>
          <td>Clang Compiler Support
          </td>
        </tr>

        <tr>
          <th>Assignee</th>
          <td>unassignedclangbugs@nondot.org
          </td>
        </tr>

        <tr>
          <th>Reporter</th>
          <td>protze@itc.rwth-aachen.de
          </td>
        </tr>

        <tr>
          <th>CC</th>
          <td>llvm-bugs@lists.llvm.org
          </td>
        </tr></table>
      <p>
        <div>
        <pre>Besides the issue of wrong scheduling as described in 
<a class="bz_bug_link 
          bz_status_NEW "
   title="NEW - Handling doacross loops: no collapse"
   href="show_bug.cgi?id=37580">https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=37580</a>, the loop iterations could overlap,
based on the dendencies expresses by the depend clause:


#include <stdio.h>
#include <omp.h>
int main()
{
  int i, j;
#pragma omp parallel for ordered(2) num_threads(2) schedule(static,10)
  for (i = 0; i < 10; i++)
    for (j = 0; j < 10; j++)
    {
#pragma omp ordered depend(sink:i-1,j) depend (sink:i,j-1)
      printf ("test %i i=%d j=%d\n",omp_get_thread_num(),i,j);
#pragma omp ordered depend(source)
    }
  return 0;
}


Using schedule(static,10), I get the work distribution which I would expect for
static,1 (after fixing the other issue). The code is executed completely
sequential. While this is not wrong, the execution could do better.

-> expected behavior: thread 1 starts working on (i=1, j=0) as soon as thread 0
finished (i=0, j=0)
-> observed behavior: thread 1 starts working on (i=1, j=0) only after thread 0
finished the whole iteration i=0 and vice versa


icc using the same OpenMP runtime provides the expected behavior. So this
should be a missing feature in the compiler.</pre>
        </div>
      </p>


      <hr>
      <span>You are receiving this mail because:</span>

      <ul>
          <li>You are on the CC list for the bug.</li>
      </ul>
    </body>
</html>