<html>

    <head>

      <base href="https://bugs.llvm.org/">

    </head>

    <body><span class="vcard"><a class="email" href="mailto:ufospoke@gmail.com" title="Frédéric <ufospoke@gmail.com>"> <span class="fn">Frédéric</span></a>

</span> changed

          <a class="bz_bug_link 

          bz_status_RESOLVED  bz_closed"

   title="RESOLVED INVALID - Lambda should implicitly capture constexpr variable"

   href="https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=37504">bug 37504</a>

          <br>

             <table border="1" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="8">

          <tr>

            <th>What</th>

            <th>Removed</th>

            <th>Added</th>

          </tr>

         <tr>

           <td style="text-align:right;">Resolution</td>

           <td>---

           </td>

           <td>INVALID

           </td>

         </tr>

         <tr>

           <td style="text-align:right;">Status</td>

           <td>NEW

           </td>

           <td>RESOLVED

           </td>

         </tr></table>

      <p>

        <div>

            <b><a class="bz_bug_link 

          bz_status_RESOLVED  bz_closed"

   title="RESOLVED INVALID - Lambda should implicitly capture constexpr variable"

   href="https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=37504#c6">Comment # 6</a>

              on <a class="bz_bug_link 

          bz_status_RESOLVED  bz_closed"

   title="RESOLVED INVALID - Lambda should implicitly capture constexpr variable"

   href="https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=37504">bug 37504</a>

              from <span class="vcard"><a class="email" href="mailto:ufospoke@gmail.com" title="Frédéric <ufospoke@gmail.com>"> <span class="fn">Frédéric</span></a>

</span></b>

        <pre>OK, I went to the end of this and I am sorry to have disturbed you but it seems

that I was wrong. The thing is that in the same function I had multiple lambdas

referring to a constexpr std::size_t. And for some of them I could remove the

capture and not for the others. So the warning was related to one of the

lambda, and I tried to remove all captures so it did not work.

I now understand that if a lambda uses a constexpr variable in a call with a

const reference, the constexpr must be capture to have a reference at the time

of the call where the reference to the original variable is not accessible.

Thanks for your help.</pre>

        </div>

      </p>

      <hr>

      <span>You are receiving this mail because:</span>

      <ul>

          <li>You are on the CC list for the bug.</li>

      </ul>

    </body>

</html>