<html>
<head>
<base href="https://bugs.llvm.org/">
</head>
<body><table border="1" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="8">
<tr>
<th>Bug ID</th>
<td><a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_NEW "
title="NEW - inconsistency in clang vs Clang usage in docs (c vs C)"
href="https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=37411">37411</a>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th>Summary</th>
<td>inconsistency in clang vs Clang usage in docs (c vs C)
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th>Product</th>
<td>clang
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th>Version</th>
<td>unspecified
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th>Hardware</th>
<td>All
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th>OS</th>
<td>All
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th>Status</th>
<td>NEW
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th>Severity</th>
<td>enhancement
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th>Priority</th>
<td>P
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th>Component</th>
<td>Documentation
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th>Assignee</th>
<td>unassignedclangbugs@nondot.org
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th>Reporter</th>
<td>jiri@navratil.cz
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th>CC</th>
<td>llvm-bugs@lists.llvm.org
</td>
</tr></table>
<p>
<div>
<pre>I was trying to discover, if I have to use and write clang or Clang. I was
close to result, that clang is for binary and in all other usage, I have to use
Clang.
In looking to man page clang(1) on OpenBSD 6.2, I read in description part
clang is a C, C++, and Objective-C compiler which encompasses
preprocessing, parsing, optimization, code generation, assembly, and
linking. Depending on which high-level mode setting is passed, Clang
will stop before doing a full link. While Clang is highly integrated, it
is important to understand the stages of compilation, to understand how
to invoke it.
So if my aasumption is correct, there is inconsistency in man page.
Could you please explicitly state ideally on more places, what is correct? and
also adjust accordingly man page?
Thank you,
Jiří</pre>
</div>
</p>
<hr>
<span>You are receiving this mail because:</span>
<ul>
<li>You are on the CC list for the bug.</li>
</ul>
</body>
</html>