<html>
<head>
<base href="https://bugs.llvm.org/">
</head>
<body><table border="1" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="8">
<tr>
<th>Bug ID</th>
<td><a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_NEW "
title="NEW - IRET instruction has a different naming convention to RET/LRET"
href="https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=36876">36876</a>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th>Summary</th>
<td>IRET instruction has a different naming convention to RET/LRET
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th>Product</th>
<td>libraries
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th>Version</th>
<td>trunk
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th>Hardware</th>
<td>PC
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th>OS</th>
<td>Windows NT
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th>Status</th>
<td>NEW
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th>Severity</th>
<td>enhancement
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th>Priority</th>
<td>P
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th>Component</th>
<td>Backend: X86
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th>Assignee</th>
<td>unassignedbugs@nondot.org
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th>Reporter</th>
<td>llvm-dev@redking.me.uk
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th>CC</th>
<td>craig.topper@gmail.com, llvm-bugs@lists.llvm.org
</td>
</tr></table>
<p>
<div>
<pre>Found during fixing models for D44687:
RET/LRET use the naming pattern:
RET(L|Q|W)
LRET(L|Q|W)
But IRET uses the naming pattern:
IRET(16|32|64)
Do we want to standardize this?
The IRET mnemonic is IRETW/IRETD/IRETQ so it seems a better match, and would
have helped the AMD guys who wrote the Znver1 entries assuming it.</pre>
</div>
</p>
<hr>
<span>You are receiving this mail because:</span>
<ul>
<li>You are on the CC list for the bug.</li>
</ul>
</body>
</html>