<html>
<head>
<base href="https://bugs.llvm.org/">
</head>
<body><span class="vcard"><a class="email" href="mailto:paulsson@linux.vnet.ibm.com" title="Jonas Paulsson <paulsson@linux.vnet.ibm.com>"> <span class="fn">Jonas Paulsson</span></a>
</span> changed
<a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_RESOLVED bz_closed"
title="RESOLVED INVALID - input module is broken! (Intrinsic has incorrect argument type!)"
href="https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=36424">bug 36424</a>
<br>
<table border="1" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="8">
<tr>
<th>What</th>
<th>Removed</th>
<th>Added</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="text-align:right;">Resolution</td>
<td>---
</td>
<td>INVALID
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="text-align:right;">Status</td>
<td>NEW
</td>
<td>RESOLVED
</td>
</tr></table>
<p>
<div>
<b><a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_RESOLVED bz_closed"
title="RESOLVED INVALID - input module is broken! (Intrinsic has incorrect argument type!)"
href="https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=36424#c7">Comment # 7</a>
on <a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_RESOLVED bz_closed"
title="RESOLVED INVALID - input module is broken! (Intrinsic has incorrect argument type!)"
href="https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=36424">bug 36424</a>
from <span class="vcard"><a class="email" href="mailto:paulsson@linux.vnet.ibm.com" title="Jonas Paulsson <paulsson@linux.vnet.ibm.com>"> <span class="fn">Jonas Paulsson</span></a>
</span></b>
<pre>(In reply to Daniel Neilson from <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=36424#c6">comment #6</a>)
<span class="quote">> I think Nemanja has likely hit the nail on the head. Specifically, he's
> referring to this change:
> r322965 | dneilson | 2018-01-19 11:13:12 -0600 (Fri, 19 Jan 2018) | 72 lines
> Remove alignment argument from memcpy/memmove/memset in favour of alignment
> attributes (Step 1)
>
> In this case, I suspect that you're running an older build of bugpoint with
> a newer IR file; and by older, I mean one that was built before the above
> change was landed. I just tried your process from <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=36424#c3">comment 3</a> on my local
> machine with ToT and both llc & bugpoint freshly built; I did not encounter
> the issue that you are reporting.
>
> Please check the build date of the bugpoint executable that you're using. If
> it's old at all, then please try rebuilding it. If the issue still persists
> with an up-to-date and freshly built bugpoint then I guess there's more
> digging to do, but I doubt it'll persist.</span >
Ah... First I found this unlikely, as I always use the bugpoint in my local
build, so it should always be up to date. It however turns out that bugpoint
looks for opt (to run the verifier) in $PATH, and I had an older opt in my PATH
variable.
Big thanks to both of you!</pre>
</div>
</p>
<hr>
<span>You are receiving this mail because:</span>
<ul>
<li>You are on the CC list for the bug.</li>
</ul>
</body>
</html>